- From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:46:42 +0200 (CEST)
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Note that at least one mobile UA offers text reflow when using pinch zoom - the Dolphin browser (Android). There may be others. Detlev -- Detlev Fischer testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45 Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 http://www.testkreis.de Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites Alastair Campbell schrieb am 08.07.2016 10:36: > > Patrick wrote: > > > I wonder if this is more of a User Agent issue (or rather, something > > > that needs to be flagged to UA developers). Old versions of Opera Mini > > > and Opera Mobile had a "text wrap" and "single column" setting > > > > Yes, that’s the sort of thing I’m advocating for. A setting where you can say “zoom beyond the initial layout and re-flow to keep within the visual viewport”. It is possible on the user agent side, thanks for the Opera link, the feedly app used to do that as well. > > > > It should be compatible with the current behavior – if a site doesn’t use meta-viewport this setting shouldn’t do anything. > > > > > > > But yes, the current behavior on mobile (that when you pinch-zoom it > > > doesn't reflow the content, but instead forces bidirectional zoom) is > > > the default behavior that works best for the majority of users (without > > > specific access requirements) right now, so unlikely to get changed by > > > default. > > > > Therefore a setting is needed. It’s one I would like to use as I often find the default text size too small and would like to zoom without panning back and forth to read. > > > > It is also an obvious issue for people with low vision on mobile, the intersection of two task forces! > > > > It needs two prongs: > > 1. A campaign (or something) to get the mobile UAs to update. > > 2. A temporary exception in the WCAG SC. I know we don’t do “until user agents…”, but the technology supported equivalent. I do also think it is such an obvious exception it needs a note by the SC. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair >
Received on Friday, 8 July 2016 08:47:12 UTC