- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:09:45 +0100
- To: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 11/07/2016 17:01, David MacDonald wrote: > If we are talking about distinguishing link text from static text, the > technique basically says "if you provide sufficient contrast with the > background and sufficient contrast between the link and the static, and > do some hover things you can get an exemption from using color alone on > page load because you have sufficient contrast a person who is color > blind will most likely be able to distinguish the link text from the > contrast change." Eric's codepen http://codepen.io/yatil/full/NAakoA/ is a perfect example of this - it passes the "there text and links have sufficient contrast with the background, and a 3:1 contrast with each other" loophole, and still as a sighted mouse user with normal color vision I was left completely baffled and unable to find the links in amongst the text. For this reason, I think the technique and the loophole it currently provides is not in the interest even of mouse users - the fact that it won't work for touchscreen users either is possibly the last nail in the coffin for it. > There was strong pressure to allow for the current practice of not > underlining links in blocks of text. > > Personally, I'm fine with ditching it. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 16:11:13 UTC