Re: Should we require all functionality to be operable with pointer?

+1!

agree

gregg

> On Jul 4, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> On 04/07/2016 21:33, Jonathan Avila wrote:
>> Ø  Anybody, know of any "real world" accessibility issues where
>> something was not available to a mouse/pointer, because of some mistake
>> by a developer that needs correcting for accessibility reasons in WCAG?
>> I can't think of anything in my experience.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I have seen assistive technologies such as features in screen readers
>> only work with the keyboard and not work correctly with the mouse.
>> Perhaps this is less likely on web pages – but I wonder if we need an
>> exception for assistive technologies?  ATs may have special features
>> that maybe it doesn’t make sense to make accessible with the mouse or
>> perhaps not with the keyboard given the purpose of the AT.  The proposed
>> Section 508 refresh has such an exception.
> 
> This is the distinction we're also talking about in the other thread about keyboard - we need to separate the function of the CONTENT (web content, app, etc) from that of the UA/AT/input mechanism, I think. Otherwise we'll keep going in circles (see also gesture support etc).
> 
> P
> -- 
> Patrick H. Lauke
> 
> www.splintered.co.uk <http://www.splintered.co.uk/> | https://github.com/patrickhlauke <https://github.com/patrickhlauke>
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ <http://flickr.com/photos/redux/> | http://redux.deviantart.com <http://redux.deviantart.com/>
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 21:18:52 UTC