Re: Proposal: expanding/modifying Guideline 2.1 and its SCs (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3) to cover Touch+AT

Gregg wrote

> It doesn’t change the discussion or arguments or importance of the keyboard access provision.

> Nor does it change the fact that any other device independent commands should be a separate success criteria.



Nope, it doesn’t change the discussion, it still remains the case that:

-          The device independent methods are more robust,

-          There is another other W3C spec that should be aligned with, and

-          It would look odd (and be less readable) to duplicate the keyboard-input SCs.



Kind regards,



-Alastair