public-html-a11y@w3.org from September 2012 by date

Friday, 28 September 2012

• Re: Longdesc extension specification Charles McCathie Nevile
• [Bug 13176] The bounds of canvas fallback content, as rendered on the canvas, are not provided by the user agent to an assistive technology. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17438] the term "hand authored" is undefined and ambiguous bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18915] Encouraged cite attribute behavior is unlikely to be implemented and so should be dropped bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17438] the term "hand authored" is undefined and ambiguous bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17438] the term "hand authored" is undefined and ambiguous bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 12885] WF3: Provide a way for the author to specify what kind of keyboard behaviour to use for text inputs on multimodal keyboards (e.g. show the numeric keyboard, capitalise the first character by default, etc) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 27 September 2012

• Minutes from Sept 27 meeting David MacDonald
• List of actively developed extension specifications (was: the maincontent element) Sam Ruby
• the maincontent element- an HTML5 extension specification Steve Faulkner
• RE: Agenda: HTML-A11Y Task Force on 27 September at 15:00Z for 60 minutes Léonie Watson
• Agenda: HTML-A11Y Task Force on 27 September at 15:00Z for 60 minutes Janina Sajka

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Minutes from yesterday's call Adrian Roselli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• [Bug 18574] @hidden should have a weak mapping to aria-hidden=true bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: TPAC Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• TPAC David MacDonald
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Sam Ruby
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Steve Faulkner
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

• [Bug 19072] Allow placeholder for color and date+ types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19049] Provide access to global accessibility settings bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19020] <audio> and <video> do not have sufficient support for synchronized accessibility content bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19055] HTML5 Lacks a Way to Programmatically-Determine Missing Text Alternatives bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19027] Media events to indicate captions and audio descriptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19018] provide clear user friendly links to WAI-ARIA documents in the ARIA section of the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19046] Add default button option/attribute for forms bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19015] Enhancement: Set only single component for each pixel bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19044] Extend accesskey="" to accept key names (e.g. accesskey="home") bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19072] New: Allow placeholder for color and date+ types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Cynthia Shelly
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Cynthia Shelly
• [Bug 19055] New: HTML5 Lacks a Way to Programmatically-Determine Missing Text Alternatives bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19049] New: Provide access to global accessibility settings bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19046] New: Add default button option/attribute for forms bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19044] New: Extend accesskey="" to accept key names (e.g. accesskey="home") bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19027] New: Media events to indicate captions and audio descriptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19020] New: <audio> and <video> do not have sufficient support for synchronized accessibility content bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19018] New: provide clear user friendly links to WAI-ARIA documents in the ARIA section of the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig
• [Bug 19015] New: Enhancement: Set only single component for each pixel bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18915] Encouraged cite attribute behavior is unlikely to be implemented and so should be dropped bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18915] Encouraged cite attribute behavior is unlikely to be implemented and so should be dropped bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update David Singer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Fwd: additional sentence for 204 Maciej Stachowiak
• Text Subteam Minutes for 25 September Judy Brewer
• The outlinemask attribute - An HTML5 extension specification Steve Faulkner
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Longdesc extension specification Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Longdesc extension specification Sam Ruby
• Re: Longdesc extension specification (was: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• [text] HTML-A11Y Text, Tues 25 September 2012, 17:00 Z, (1PM Eastern), 90 min Judy Brewer
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• [Bug 9213] HTML5 Lacks a Way to Programmatically-Determine Missing Text Alternatives bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13619] Provide access to global accessibility settings bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9280] Add default button option/attribute for forms bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13576] Extend accesskey="" to accept key names (e.g. accesskey="home") bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 12868] Allow placeholder for color and date+ types bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 8659] Media events to indicate captions and audio descriptions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 5758] <audio> and <video> do not have sufficient support for synchronized accessibility content bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10464] provide clear user friendly links to WAI-ARIA documents in the ARIA section of the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13096] Enhancement: Set only single component for each pixel bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13096] Enhancement: Set only single component for each pixel bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: Destructive threading (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) John Foliot
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• [Bug 16005] Media elements: I would suggest that Subtitle support be implemented for Audio Media elements for the hearing impaired users. It should also include an api that would allow custom presentation of the subtitles. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 16005] Media elements: I would suggest that Subtitle support be implemented for Audio Media elements for the hearing impaired users. It should also include an api that would allow custom presentation of the subtitles. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Destructive threading (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• RE: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) John Foliot
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig

Monday, 24 September 2012

• Re: What does "works" mean here? Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update David Singer
• Re: A longer description feature that vendors could accept (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Sam Ruby
• Re: A longer description feature that vendors could accept (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update David Singer
• subline element - HTML5 extension specification Steve Faulkner
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• Re: What does "works" mean here? Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig
• Longdesc extension specification (was: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile
• @fullsize (was: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Geoff Freed

Sunday, 23 September 2012

• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Geoff Freed
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Matthew Turvey
• What does "works" mean here? Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Sam Ruby
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Sam Ruby
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Sam Ruby

Saturday, 22 September 2012

• RE: longdesc quality statistics John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update James Craig

Friday, 21 September 2012

• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: longdesc document for the record Sam Ruby
• Re: longdesc document for the record Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: additional sentence for 204 James Craig
• Re: longdesc document for the record Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Fwd: longdesc document for the record Sam Ruby
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Leif H Silli
• Re: Long descriptions spec - a basic idea Sam Ruby
• Re: Long descriptions spec - a basic idea Leif H Silli
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Charles McCathie Nevile
• RE: Long descriptions spec - a basic idea John Foliot
• Re: longdesc quality statistics Steve Faulkner
• Re: longdesc quality statistics David Singer
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Janina Sajka
• Re: Long descriptions spec - a basic idea Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Fwd: longdesc document for the record Laura Carlson
• Re: Fwd: longdesc document for the record Sam Ruby
• longdesc quality statistics Charles McCathie Nevile
• Implementing longdesc ... Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile
• Fwd: longdesc document for the record Laura Carlson
• [Bug 18010] @hidden sections should be excluded from the outline (or a note should be added, that hidden sections are included). The same goes for hidden headings of sections that are not hidden. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Long descriptions spec - a basic idea Sam Ruby
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• Long descriptions spec - a basic idea Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Issue 30 (Was: RE: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Sam Ruby
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Silvia Pfeiffer

Thursday, 20 September 2012

• Re: Requesting Clarification re CR Exit Stacks Criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Requesting Clarification re CR Exit Stacks Criteria Leif Halvard Silli
• FW: Issue 30 (Was: RE: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) John Foliot
• RE: Requesting Clarification re CR Exit Stacks Criteria John Foliot
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Sam Ruby
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Sam Ruby
• Minutes HTML-A11Y Task Force 20 September Michael Cooper
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• Re: Requesting Clarification re CR Exit Stacks Criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Sam Ruby
• Requesting Clarification re CR Exit Stacks Criteria Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> (janina@rednote.net)
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Maciej Stachowiak
• FW: [HTMLWG] CR Exit Criteria redux Paul Cotton
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 John Foliot
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Issue 30 (Was: RE: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Sam Ruby
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Sam Ruby
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Steve Faulkner
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Laura Carlson
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Steve Faulkner
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Steve Faulkner
• RE: Agenda: HTML-A11Y Task Force on 20 September at 15:00Z for 60 minutes Léonie Watson
• Agenda: HTML-A11Y Task Force on 20 September at 15:00Z for 60 minutes Janina Sajka
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• RE: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) John Foliot
• Re: Extension spec for hgroup (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014) Sam Ruby
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Judy Brewer
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Laura Carlson
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Laura Carlson
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Laura Carlson
• Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014 Paul Cotton
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Janina Sajka
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• Re: How to obsolete @longdesc Laura Carlson
• Data collection and analysis (was RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) John Foliot
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif H Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 18915] Encouraged cite attribute behavior is unlikely to be implemented and so should be dropped bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif H Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: How to obsolete @longdesc Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: How to obsolete @longdesc Laura Carlson
• Re: How to obsolete @longdesc Laura Carlson
• Re: How to obsolete @longdesc Sam Ruby
• Re: How to obsolete @longdesc Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: How to obsolete @longdesc Laura Carlson
• How to obsolete @longdesc Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: What's in a name? Laura Carlson
• Re: What's in a name? Leif Halvard Silli
• Water under the bridge Laura Carlson
• Re: A longer description feature that vendors could accept (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: What's in a name? Sam Ruby
• Re: What's in a name? Laura Carlson
• Re: A longer description feature that vendors could accept (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Laura Carlson
• Re: A longer description feature that vendors could accept (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: What's in a name? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Janina Sajka
• Re: A longer description feature that vendors could accept (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• What's in a name? Laura Carlson
• A longer description feature that vendors could accept (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Joshue O Connor
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Laura Carlson
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Steve Faulkner
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Steve Faulkner
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Geoff Freed
• Re: "turn the image around" UI idea Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Cynthia Shelly
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• "turn the image around" UI idea Laura Carlson
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Swapped in new approved CP overlay text (was Re: Text Subteam Minutes for 18 September) Laura Carlson
• Swapped in new approved CP overlay text (was Re: Text Subteam Minutes for 18 September) Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif H Silli
• Text Subteam Minutes for 18 September Janina Sajka
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Laura Carlson
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Janina Sajka
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• [Bug 15193] draggable and dropzone regions require labels bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17438] the term "hand authored" is undefined and ambiguous bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• [Bug 17438] the term "hand authored" is undefined and ambiguous bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Richard Schwerdtfeger
• [Bug 17438] the term "hand authored" is undefined and ambiguous bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Steve Faulkner
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Léonie Watson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• [text] HTML-A11Y Text, Tues 18 September 2012, 17:00 Z, (1PM Eastern), 90 min Judy Brewer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• AAPI meeting agenda for 9/18 Cynthia Shelly
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot

Monday, 17 September 2012

• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Sam Ruby
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Map element clarification (Was: additional sentence for 204) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Gez Lemon
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update David Singer
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Gez Lemon
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update David Singer
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Geoff Freed
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Gez Lemon
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update David Singer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update David MacDonald
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot
• Re: additional sentence for 204 James Craig
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Laura Carlson
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Joshue O Connor
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Laura Carlson
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Joshue O Connor
• In defence of iCab as an example... Charles McCathie Nevile
• RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update John Foliot

Sunday, 16 September 2012

• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif H Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Joshue O Connor
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Steve Faulkner
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Steve Faulkner
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Joshue O Connor
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Leif Halvard Silli

Saturday, 15 September 2012

• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Joshue O Connor
• RE: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Laura Carlson
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Laura Carlson
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Sam Ruby
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Laura Carlson
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) Sam Ruby
• [Bug 13958] Authors should be able to request specific modifiers for accesskeys bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13958] Authors should be able to request specific modifiers for accesskeys bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update) James Craig

Friday, 14 September 2012

• RE: additional sentence for 204 David MacDonald
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13958] Authors should be able to request specific modifiers for accesskeys bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18166] srcset is wrong and hard to read bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Joshue O Connor
• ISSUE 204 Joshue O Connor
• RE: additional sentence for 204 David MacDonald
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17117] definition of meta keyword "generator" should mention effect on validation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9212] Change the Generator Mechanism for img from Document Level to Element Level bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17117] definition of meta keyword "generator" should mention effect on validation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: additional sentence for 204 James Craig
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Janina Sajka
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Janina Sajka

Thursday, 13 September 2012

• Re: additional sentence for 204 James Craig
• Re: additional sentence for 204 James Craig
• Re: additional sentence for 204 James Craig
• Re: additional sentence for 204 Janina Sajka
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Laura Carlson
• Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Janina Sajka
• additional sentence for 204 Cynthia Shelly

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

• Working together on HTML5 and ARIA Tim Berners-Lee

Thursday, 13 September 2012

• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update Janina Sajka
• [Bug 18859] Update spec to match latest ISSUE-204 wording bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18245] Conveying state of an Active tab in tabbed panels to Assistive Technologies like screen readers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Minutes HTML-A11Y Task Force 13 September 2012 Michael Cooper
• Re: Agenda: HTML-A11Y Task Force on 13 September at 15:00Z for 60 minutes Laura Carlson
• Re: [updated] proposed rewording of ISSUE-204 text James Craig
• Agenda: HTML-A11Y Task Force on 13 September at 15:00Z for 60 minutes Janina Sajka

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18793] Remove Sentence as requested by Formal Objection on HTML Issue-204 Decision bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: 48-hour Consensus Call - Expedited Formal Objection on HTML Issue-204 Decision Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Please put in interim text for the ISSUE-204 statement about exposing semantics of hidden content Maciej Stachowiak
• Issue-204 -- New proposal on HTML list Janina Sajka

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook David Singer
• [Bug 8716] Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers with Suggested Text for Short Text Alternatives bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9212] Change the Generator Mechanism for img from Document Level to Element Level bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9212] Change the Generator Mechanism for img from Document Level to Element Level bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [text] No HTML-A11Y Text Subteam meeting Tues 11 September Judy Brewer
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Proposed rewording of ISSUE-204 text to address outstanding technical issues Maciej Stachowiak
• internet explorer and UI automation Steve Faulkner
• RE: Proposed rewording of ISSUE-204 text to address outstanding technical issues John Foliot
• Re: Proposed rewording of ISSUE-204 text to address outstanding technical issues Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Proposed rewording of ISSUE-204 text to address outstanding technical issues John Foliot
• RE: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Leif Halvard Silli
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 10 September 2012

• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17117] definition of meta keyword "generator" should mention effect on validation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17117] definition of meta keyword "generator" should mention effect on validation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook John Foliot
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Apology (was RE: [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Sam Ruby
• RE: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Matt May
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Apology (was RE: [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204) John Foliot
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13359] <track> A way is needed to identify the type of data in a track element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 9 September 2012

• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13359] <track> A way is needed to identify the type of data in a track element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 8 September 2012

• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13359] <track> A way is needed to identify the type of data in a track element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 7 September 2012

• [Bug 13359] <track> A way is needed to identify the type of data in a track element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 18438] The Table summary attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13359] <track> A way is needed to identify the type of data in a track element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13359] <track> A way is needed to identify the type of data in a track element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 13359] <track> A way is needed to identify the type of data in a track element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [aapi] Sept 8 agenda for HTML to AAPI mapping Cynthia Shelly
• [Bug 17117] definition of meta keyword "generator" should mention effect on validation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18438] The Table summary attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook John Foliot
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18438] The Table summary attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18385] Programmatic association of a page element to a 'description' text in a different uri bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18438] The Table summary attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18450] Consider adding a screen capture example bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 6 September 2012

• [Bug 18010] @hidden sections should be excluded from the outline (or a note should be added, that hidden sections are included). The same goes for hidden headings of sections that are not hidden. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: new long description attribute (was Re: {minutes}} HTML WG telecon 2012-09-06) Laura Carlson
• Re: new long description attribute (was Re: {minutes}} HTML WG telecon 2012-09-06) Janina Sajka
• [Bug 18384] Consider adding an adaptive image element bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• new long description attribute (was Re: {minutes}} HTML WG telecon 2012-09-06) Laura Carlson
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18793] Remove Sentence as requested by Formal Objection on HTML Issue-204 Decision bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18793] Remove Sentence as requested by Formal Objection on HTML Issue-204 Decision bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18793] Remove Sentence as requested by Formal Objection on HTML Issue-204 Decision bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14150] I am a photographer as well as a hand-coding web designer. One thing that frustrates me is the duplicity between alt="" and title="" for photographs and photographers. For instance: <img class="thumbnail" alt="David Kyles" title="David Kyles Shock and Awe bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 14150] I am a photographer as well as a hand-coding web designer. One thing that frustrates me is the duplicity between alt="" and title="" for photographs and photographers. For instance: <img class="thumbnail" alt="David Kyles" title="David Kyles Shock and Awe bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18793] Remove Sentence as requested by Formal Objection on HTML Issue-204 Decision bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Steve Faulkner
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Steve Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Steve Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Steve Faulkner
• Regrets for today's accessibility task force meeting Laura Carlson
• Regrets for this week/next Léonie Watson

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

• Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "InstateLongdesc" - outlook Sam Ruby
• Text subteam minutes for 4 September 2012 Judy Brewer
• [Bug 18744] drop WAI-ARIA scope restriction in the text adopted in ISSUE-204 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 18745] Reword text adopted by ISSUE-204 to avoid certain implications bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [text] HTML-A11Y Text, Tues 4 September 2012, 17:00 Z, (1PM Eastern), 60 min Laura Carlson
• Re: [text] HTML-A11Y Text, Tues 4 September 2012, 17:00 Z, (1PM Eastern), 60 min Judy Brewer
• Re: [text] HTML-A11Y Text, Tues 4 September 2012, 17:00 Z, (1PM Eastern), 60 min Laura Carlson
• [text] HTML-A11Y Text, Tues 4 September 2012, 17:00 Z, (1PM Eastern), 60 min Judy Brewer

Sunday, 2 September 2012

• [Bug 13176] The bounds of canvas fallback content, as rendered on the canvas, are not provided by the user agent to an assistive technology. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 8716] Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers with Suggested Text for Short Text Alternatives bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9212] Change the Generator Mechanism for img from Document Level to Element Level bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Last message date: Friday, 28 September 2012 22:13:12 UTC