Re: additional sentence for 204

Does this sufficiently address the Issue 204 discussion from this morning's teleconference?
http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-html-a11y-minutes.html#item01


On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:18 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:

> How about this take?
> 
> Note: Only hidden="" elements that are referenced indirectly by a unique identifier (ID) reference or valid hash-name reference may have their structure and content exposed upon user request. Authors desiring to prevent user-initiated viewing of hidden="" elements should remove identifier (ID) or hash-name references to the element.
> 
> 
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 2:51 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> Janina,
>> 
>> I don't have substantive objections with either of these, and only minor editorial objections to tense and style.
>> 
>> James
>> 
>> 
>> Cynthia's 
>>>> Note: Authors have control over whether elements with the @hidden attribute will be exposed in this manner.  Only elements that are is referenced indirectly by a unique identifier (ID) reference or valid hash-name reference will be exposed.  If an author does not wish to have a @hidden element exposed, he may achieve this by not referencing the element.
>> 
>> Janina's:
>> 
>>> Author  control, as opposed to user control  over whether elements with the @hidden attribute may be exposed to users will be delineated in this manner.  Only elements that are referenced indirectly by a unique identifier (ID) reference or valid hash-name reference may be exposed at user request.  An author desiring to keep a @hidden element hidden from any and all user initiated viewing scenarios may achieve this by simply not referencing the element.
>> 
>> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 13 September 2012 22:32:00 UTC