- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:13:39 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18438 --- Comment #3 from Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie> 2012-09-07 18:13:39 UTC --- @Devarshi The user agent (the screen reader) still supports the attribute, that is why it will still work even with a HTML5 !DOCTYPE. It won't be valid HTML5 however, but that may not be an issue for you if you want to support a particular kind of user experience, so I say 'Go for it!' >aria-describedby or similar alternatives, in my view, may not be as robust as >the table summary. They are excellent alternatives, and indeed the future. However, @summary is 'hidden' by nature and aria-describedby will only point to an in page description and not a description in another URI. @summary for me was really good for the use cases that it supported (Blind, screen reader users who need a longer description for complex data tables) but the WG decided this wasn't good enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 18:13:41 UTC