Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update

Maciej Stachowiak, Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:48:01 -0700:
> Unfortunately, the conversation still seems to be on 
> mandate-or-no-mandate rather than engagement in crafting a solution.

Sam hinted at that there could be a solution that vendors would be 
willing to implement.

I'll note that your negativity towards @longdesc irrespective of 
"implementation ideas" is a point which, to me, does not support Sam's 
positive outline. Unless what your are willing to implement is so 
different from the ideas, then I would have expected a "yes, but with 
another name" or "yes, but we would have to implement it differently". 
(And then a description of the method.)
-- 
leif h silli

Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 09:28:48 UTC