Re: My case for the obsoletion of longdesc (Was: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update)

Hi again Sam,

Sorry, I neglected to add the reference:
"Sam and Paul, if the task force does not reach a successful CFC on
the proposed new text, please use the current text for the survey as
it does have consensus."
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Sep/0004.html

Best Regards,
Laura

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Laura Carlson
<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> Yes. I am ready for the survey.
>
> Best Regards,
> Laura
>
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> On 09/15/2012 11:22 AM, Laura Carlson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The HTML Chairs control the timetable.
>>
>>
>> The last status I heard from you is that the TF needs more time[1].  In your
>> opinion, is that now complete?  The last input I heard from Judy is that
>> this is not, but is a matter of a few days away.  In fact, I believe that
>> this very consensus call is a part of that process?
>>
>> Let me know if you feel otherwise.
>>
>> Additionally we have holds that we need to resolve from both the Interaction
>> Domain lead and the Director himself.  The chairs met F2F with Tim, Jeff,
>> PLH, and Judy yesterday (Janina, Mike, and Robin were on the phone for parts
>> of this meeting).
>>
>> The HTML WG chairs intend to meet again with Judy and Janina on Monday.
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/08/30-html-wg-minutes.html
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson



-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Saturday, 15 September 2012 16:16:29 UTC