Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update

Charles McCathie Nevile, Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:33:53 +0200:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:44:34 +0200, Sam Ruby wrote:

>> Again I ask: is there any chance that we can get a consensus spec out of
>> this: one that doesn't attempt to portray publishing software that
>> produces markup including longdesc as non-conforming; nor does it
>> attempt to portray user agent software that doesn't natively implement
>> longdesc as non-conforming?
>> 
>> Geoff: if such an extension specification were written, could you live
>> with that for now?
> 
> In case we can get consensus on such an approach, I'll draft an extension
> spec.

+1  

And please include A11Y APIs: 
http://www.w3.org/mid/505E6A3A.3050102@intertwingly.net

> I believe it is a compromise. But it is one I could live with.

Agree.
-- 
Leif Halvard Silli

Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 09:11:15 UTC