- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:24:09 -0700
- To: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "'Steve Faulkner'" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Paul Cotton'" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, <public-html@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, <janina@rednote.net>, "'Philippe Le Hegaret'" <plh@w3.org>, <jbrewer@w3.org>, "'Jeff Jaffe'" <jeff@w3.org>, "'Tim Berners-Lee'" <timbl@w3.org>
Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Similarly, I was surprised by what is stated for Issue-194 > full-transcript attribute : > > Allow the A11y TF the authority to produce an extension spec that > includes full-transcript. If such a specification obtains consensus > and meets the proposed CR exit criteria by 2014Q2 it could be folded > back into the core HTML spec at that time. > > We already have two change proposals for this issue that both came out > of the a11y TF. I was under impression that the next step was a > decision by the chairs. Are you now expecting the a11y TF to decide > between the two change proposals and come up with spec text for it? > As a point of clarification, there are actually 3 Change Proposals that were presented to the Working Group - the third being that the question be deferred to HTML.next. (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-194-objection-poll/results) I further note that this 3rd option was strongly opposed by the a11yTF: "The HTML-A11Y Task Force has resolved objection to the Zero Change Proposal on Issue-194 without objection as recorded at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Jul/0065.html" I echo Silvia's surprise, as I too was expecting a decision from the Chairs at this time. JF
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 16:24:57 UTC