Re: 48-Hour Consensus Call: InstateLongdesc CP Update

On 09/17/2012 06:48 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote:
>
>> It comes down to 2 paths forward as I see it: one is that we
>> mandate something that browsers will continue ignore, or we
>> actively engage them in crafting the solution, one that meets all
>> of the user requirements.
>>
>> I think it's fairly obvious which I hope will be chosen - the
>> "which group dictates to the other" approach is not working. (I
>> will also note in passing that active listening is a requirement on
>> BOTH parts)
>
> I think you are right about that. Unfortunately, the conversation
> still seems to be on mandate-or-no-mandate rather than engagement in
> crafting a solution.

+1

- Sam Ruby

Received on Monday, 17 September 2012 23:40:31 UTC