- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:40:05 -0400
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, 'Joshue O Connor' <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, 'Silvia Pfeiffer' <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 'Steve Faulkner' <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On 09/17/2012 06:48 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Sep 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote: > >> It comes down to 2 paths forward as I see it: one is that we >> mandate something that browsers will continue ignore, or we >> actively engage them in crafting the solution, one that meets all >> of the user requirements. >> >> I think it's fairly obvious which I hope will be chosen - the >> "which group dictates to the other" approach is not working. (I >> will also note in passing that active listening is a requirement on >> BOTH parts) > > I think you are right about that. Unfortunately, the conversation > still seems to be on mandate-or-no-mandate rather than engagement in > crafting a solution. +1 - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 17 September 2012 23:40:31 UTC