- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:53:08 -0700
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: >> - Gain agreement that the remaining open issues can proceed via extension specifications at first. Provide an opportunity to merge extension specifications back into the baseline spec upon getting WG consensus and after the extension specifications meet their Candidate Recommendation exit criteria. >> -Welcome the option of extension specifications that don't merge back at all and instead proceed at different paces and possibly even with different Candidate Recommendation exit criteria. > > What does this mean for ISSUE-30? Will the HTML Chairs expedite it as > they committed to do in May 2011? Will you be holding the objection > survey imminently? If you read the linked plan, it includes a concrete proposal for how to address all currently open issues, including ISSUE-30. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 20:54:04 UTC