- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:41:55 +1000
- To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie> wrote: > Joshue O Connor wrote: > [...] > >>>> "We should not define the user experience". > > > Actually, that should be the UI (User Interface/User Interaction) but it > does still inform the UX. Why do you keep repeating Ian's opinion? Do you agree with it? If we agree to give @longdesc another lease of life (and I am not saying that I have made up my mind on whether we should), I would suggested to provide informative text that helps a UA come up with a UI. That's not "defining the UI", but instead it is providing food for thought. I think we have several such suggestions mentioned even in this thread already. It would be valuable to make a list of them and discuss their pros and cons and maybe come up with one or two that we would like to list as implementation examples. Note that we need to be careful to pick something that also works on devices that have no mouse. Regards, Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 07:42:42 UTC