public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from March 2016 by subject

[dwbp] Changes on Data Reuse section

[DWBP] Intended Outcomes and Tests

[DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker

[DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker - for all doc editors

[Minutes] 2016-02-26

[Minutes] 2016-03-02

[Minutes] 2016-03-04

[Minutes] 2016-03-11

Action-148

action-252 data usage vocabulary timetable

addressing old comments from Erik W

Agenda for the rescheduled call TOMORROW

Agenda for tomorrow - countdown to Zagreb

Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

Agenda for tomorrow…

BP #30 https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#GatherFeedback

BPs on data and metadata (was: metadata on metadata quality)

Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? (issue 200)

close dwbp-ACTION-250: Update the config on respec with the public mailing address and answer comment lc-3062 (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150625/3062)

Comments / Actions / Issues

Comments on Tracker

comments regarding versioning

content negotiation in BP doc

Correspond Example number to BP number

data "enrichment"

Data Identification BPs

Data reuse split into 3 - review

Data usage vocabulary examples updated

DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description

DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP

DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - Issue-202 - representing conformance

DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - metadata on metadata quality

DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - representing conformance levels

DUV updates...

DWBP - Last Call before CR

DWBP Open issues

dwbp-ACTION-219: Send an email to discuss the suggestion to add the assertion that a dataset's metadata conforms to a standard (like geojson)

dwbp-ACTION-238: Include rdfa to the human-readable example of strucutral metadata (dwbp-example.html)

dwbp-ACTION-239: Check on using an example about real-time data for bp23

dwbp-ACTION-240: Work on the bp for enriching data before the f2f

dwbp-ACTION-241: Review bp 22

dwbp-ACTION-242: Follow up on issue 220

dwbp-ACTION-243: Arrange redseign of the challenges diagram

dwbp-ACTION-244: Remove the 2nd line of test section and rewrite the intended outcome of the bp2 provide descriptive metadata

dwbp-ACTION-245: Update bp 11 table to link to the pdf and the gh update.

dwbp-ACTION-246: Rewrite bp11, in particular the way the external refs are included

dwbp-ACTION-247: Fill in the blanks in table at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#requirements

dwbp-ACTION-248: Write a bp around accuracy and precision, the pitfalls of false accuracy etc.

dwbp-ACTION-249: Answer comment 3051 from eric wilde (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150224/3051)

dwbp-ACTION-250: Update the config on respec with the public mailing address and answer comment lc-3062 (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150625/3062)

dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv

dwbp-ACTION-252: Create time table for duv progress/iterations

dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181

dwbp-ACTION-254: Turn the text of issue 11 into a note in the doc

dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222

dwbp-ACTION-256: Add a note saying that new motivations can be defined but that this should be done following the open annotation guidelines

dwbp-ACTION-257: Add a table describing the resource dqv:qualutyassessment

dwbp-ACTION-258: Remove the domain from dqv:indimension, move it from section measurement and add it in the dqv diagram and send a email to jeremy. with the new definition of dqv:indimension, where dqv:indimension is a super-property of the inverse of daq:hasmetric

dwbp-ACTION-259: Add examples showing user feedback for questioning and classification.

dwbp-ACTION-260: to ensure text makes clear that dimensions anad categories are defined as subclasses of skos:concept

dwbp-ACTION-261: Add a note to the effect of the decision about using shacl rather than abstract and sub classes.

dwbp-ACTION-262: Turn an existing paragraph on representing conformance and non-conformance into the note pointing to geodcat-ap

dwbp-ACTION-263: Assess compatibility of dqv with data cube by 2016-04-15

dwbp-ACTION-264: Ensure that the bp doc refers to the example for representing precision and accuracy in the dqv

dwbp-ACTION-265: Add line on frag identifiers in best practice 15: provide data in multiple formats

dwbp-ACTION-266: Include namespace table at top

dwbp-ACTION-267: Attempt to merge the bps on api documetnation

dwbp-ACTION-268: Add intro to daq in the dqv

dwbp-ACTION-269: Top creatre wiki page to collect a wish list for a future wg

dwbp-ACTION-270: Validate html and accessibility rules of dwbp-example.html

dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace

dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-230: Should we consider other BP benefits? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-235: Namespaces in DUV [Data Usage Vocabulary]

dwbp-ISSUE-243: Representing precision and accuracy [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]

dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-245 (summary-filter): To include filters in the summary to sort BPs according to Benefits or Challenges [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-246: Find an alternative to make the Challenges' diagram bigger [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-247 (dataset-discovery): How to test dataset discoverability? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-248 (feedback-reuse): To change the Feedback section to Data Reuse section. [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-249 (fragment identifiers): Discussion about fragment identifiers [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-251: [Best practices document(s)]

Example of BP Provide bulk download

Example of BP Provide real-time access

Feedback about examples

Fwd: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? (issue 200)

Fwd: Comments on Tracker

Fwd: International Open Data Conference in Madrid - Proposals

Fwd: New dqv:inDimension

Fwd: Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week

Help with issues 245 and

Helping with reviews

International Open Data Conference in Madrid - DWBP Proposal

ISSUE-148: Can we use the five star rating system as a BP document metric to describe Open Data instead of a path to LD?

ISSUE-167 Re: Language properties - eating one's own dog food

issue-219 Removing Section 9 in DUV

ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance?

ISSUE-228: Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Context section?

ISSUE-232: Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example

ISSUE-239: machine-readable standardized data formats - serialization data formats - dataset formats

ISSUE-240: To consider a new bp around numeric accuracy. comes from sdw's concern about useless extra decmimal places

ISSUE-242: APIs on the Web (for publishing Data on the Web) Best Practices

ISSUE-94: Dataset versioning and dataset replication

Language properties - eating one's own dog food

Links between (vocabulary and quality) requirements and BPs

Machine Readable Example 2

Meeting Dates w/c 21 and 28 March

Meeting time this week

New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications

New DQV example for Quality Policy

New dqv:inDimension

old issues we've been ignoring

Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb

Parameters for metrics - Issue-223

Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples

Questions about provenance BP 6

Regrets for tomorrow...

Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations

Remaining work on DUV

Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting

Review of BP on data re-use

some comments on the DWBP draft

some thoughts on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/222

Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week

Subsetting BP

Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc.

Today's call is NOW

Today's Timing

Update BP Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets

Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies

Updates examples for BP Choose the right formalization level

updates to BP doc

Wish list

Zagreb F2F Remote participation

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2016 23:11:09 UTC