- From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:35:35 +0100
- To: "Debattista, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOHhXmSkbKHWatsjBJoNVV1JM63UsyWeQqVHJ22ecogfErWb0w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jeremy ( and all), On 18 March 2016 at 12:44, Debattista, Jeremy < Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Hi Riccardo, > > I understand the concern that further “quality stuff” can (and will) > emerge in the future. On the other hand, I do not think that restricting > the domain of inDimension would hinder this. Actually, I think this would > make it easier for different metrics to be interoperable as well. If we > consider this from an application point of view, it will make it very hard > to understand the semantics of the different quality metrics. Taking the > example I mentioned before, how come a foaf profile suddenly can become a > quality metric? > In fact, as a consequence of the inDimension domain removal, the foaf profile you have mentioned is not becoming a metric, If someone wants it as a metric, she/he must instantiate it as dqv:Metric .. If you are using inDimension alone you are basically saying "I have something which might be connected to a quality dimension", that's it .. > I think inDimension domain should be restricted, and future quality stuff, > should adhere to that restriction. Otherwise if we allow anyone to do > anything in the DQV I’m afraid that we will end up with low quality, > quality metadata. > It is not that anyone can do anything, when the stuff about quality is of one the foreseen types ( annotations, metrics, quality policies, standards), our DQV document explains how it should be made fitting ;) @the rest of the group Are there other members in the group who think we should be more prescriptive and specify the inDimension domain? In case, this might be a good timing to say it.. Cheers, Riccardo > > Cheers, > Jer > > On 18 Mar 2016, at 12:28, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> > wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > yes you can have basically anything connected to Dimensions. > > In particular, metrics, annotations, standards, and quality policy are > explicitly related to quality dimensions in the new version of DQV. > Of course we might have restricted inDimension domain only to the > aforementioned classes, but by not doing so, the door is left open to > further "quality stuff" which can emerge in the future. > > Does it make any sense to you? > > Cheers, > Riccardo > > > > On 17 March 2016 at 18:07, Debattista, Jeremy < > Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > >> Hi Riccardo, >> >> I didn’t really understand why the domain of inDimension was removed. >> Wouldn’t that be a bit risky, in the sense that now anything can be in a >> dimension (technically speaking my foaf profile can be in a quality >> dimension), right? >> >> Cheers, >> Jer >> >> On 17 Mar 2016, at 17:08, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jeremy, >> As part of action 258 [1], I have to tell you that the property >> dqv:inDimension has been revised: we decided to remove its domain and it >> is currently defined as the super-property of daq:hasMetric 's inverse. >> >> If you are wondering how the new inDimension looks like, you can take a >> look at [2]. >> >> Cheers, >> Riccardo >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/258 >> [2] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#dqv:inDimension >> >> >> -- >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Riccardo Albertoni >> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico >> Magenes" >> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche >> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA >> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 >> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it >> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni >> www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>* >> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni >> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf >> >> >> > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico > Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>* > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Riccardo Albertoni Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>* http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 14:36:06 UTC