W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: New dqv:inDimension

From: Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:44:28 +0000
To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
CC: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C865ED55-4F46-4685-8509-9124742C2083@iais.fraunhofer.de>
Hi Riccardo,

I understand the concern that further “quality stuff” can (and will) emerge in the future. On the other hand, I do not think that restricting the domain of inDimension would hinder this. Actually, I think this would make it easier for different metrics to be interoperable as well. If we consider this from an application point of view, it will make it very hard to understand the semantics of the different quality metrics. Taking the example I mentioned before, how come a foaf profile suddenly can become a quality metric?

I think inDimension domain should be restricted, and future quality stuff, should adhere to that restriction. Otherwise if we allow anyone to do anything in the DQV I’m afraid that we will end up with low quality, quality metadata.

Cheers,
Jer

On 18 Mar 2016, at 12:28, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it<mailto:albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>> wrote:

Hi Jeremy,
yes you can have basically anything connected to Dimensions.

 In particular, metrics,   annotations, standards, and quality policy are explicitly  related to quality dimensions in  the new version of DQV.
Of course we might have restricted   inDimension domain  only to the aforementioned classes, but  by  not doing so,  the door  is left open to further "quality stuff" which can emerge in the future.

Does it make any sense to you?

Cheers,
Riccardo



On 17 March 2016 at 18:07, Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de<mailto:Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>> wrote:
Hi Riccardo,

I didn’t really understand why the domain of inDimension was removed. Wouldn’t that be a bit risky, in the sense that now anything can be in a dimension (technically speaking my foaf profile can be in a quality dimension), right?

Cheers,
Jer

On 17 Mar 2016, at 17:08, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it<mailto:albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>> wrote:

Hi Jeremy,
As part of action 258 [1], I have to tell you that the property dqv:inDimension has been revised: we decided to remove its domain  and  it is currently defined as the super-property of  daq:hasMetric 's inverse.

If you are wondering how the new inDimension looks like, you can take a look at [2].

Cheers,
Riccardo

[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/258

[2] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#dqv:inDimension



--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624<tel:%2B39-010-6475624> - fax +39-010-6475660<tel:%2B39-010-6475660>
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it<mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni

www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/

http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni

FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf





--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it<mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni

www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/

http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni

FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf


Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 11:45:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 18 March 2016 11:45:09 UTC