- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:05:41 +0100
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, "Newton Calegari" <newton@nic.br>
Hi Andrea, Bernadette, Caroline, Newton, I'm flagging this to the BP editors in a new thread... Antoine -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - metadata on metadata quality Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:40:08 +0100 From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> Organization: European Commission - Joint Research Centre To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> CC: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org> Hi, Antoine. On 07/03/2016 11:45, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Note that we could also add a note about this in the Best Practices > document, for example when we talk about quality of data: > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#quality > > My issue is that if we do this, then perhaps all best practices that are > stated to apply to the data should also be stated for the metadata. > > Well, actually I have tried to do this for the two BPs I curate: > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataVocabularies ("Use standardized > terms") and ("Reuse vocabularies") > But fitting this aspect in the entire document properly is way beyond > what I can offer myself here! Just thinking aloud, but I wonder whether a scoping note could be added to the metadata BP (http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#metadata). As the very first BP, it is probably the right place to add such a general statement / caveat. Cheers, Andrea
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:06:18 UTC