- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:22:44 -0700
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56FC1974.7000804@lbl.gov>
Shouldn't we have a step of "everybody read the doc and find errors/problems" and then a step of fixing them? -Annette On 3/30/16 9:09 AM, Deirdre Lee wrote: > Hi, > > In today's chairs call we discussed voting on moving the BP doc to CR > this Friday. > > There is tons of work going on and we're sooo nearly done. But the > following two things make us hesitate moving to CR: > > * (to a minor degree) remaining open issues & actions > * (more importantly) there have been a lot of updates to the > document since last published version. As part of the W3C CR > process we have to clearly demonstrate we have received feedback > on each version. We might have trouble proving this with the newer > content. > > Remember, once we go to CR, we cannot edit the document, we are just > asking for implementations. If there are major comments, we will have > to roll-back. > > So, the proposed solution :) > > 1. This Friday, we aim to close all issues and actions and freeze doc > 2. Next Friday 8th Apr, we vote on publishing this draft of BP doc as > 'last call' > 3. We shout loudly about the BP doc and get comments from far & wide > - demonstrating feedback! > 4. By 29th Apr, we address comments received and vote on CR > > That sound okay? > > Cheers, > Deirdre > > > ------------------------------------ > Deirdre Lee, CEO & Founder > Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions > > Web:www.derilinx.com > Email:deirdre@derilinx.com > Address: 11/12 Baggot Court, Dublin 2, D02 F891 > Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 > Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > Twitter: @deirdrelee -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:23:20 UTC