Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)]

Yes, I agree it's a good thing to do. I misunderstood the intent before.
-Annette

On 3/15/16 7:52 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
> Hello Annette,
>
> It is really a common practice to include a namespace table on W3C 
> documents.
>
> Antoine  also mentioned this in one of his messages [1].
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bernadette
>
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Feb/0088.html
>
> 2016-03-14 23:50 GMT+01:00 Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov 
> <mailto:amgreiner@lbl.gov>>:
>
>     Why would we need that? The examples are fictitious and should
>     have no life beyond our doc.
>
>
>     On 3/14/16 3:27 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>>     +1
>>
>>     Create an appendix.
>>
>>     On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices
>>     Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org
>>     <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the
>>         namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best
>>         practices document(s)]
>>
>>         http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/250
>>
>>         Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio
>>         On product: Best practices document(s)
>>
>>         If not, where should we include the namespaces?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>     -- 
>     Annette Greiner
>     NERSC Data and Analytics Services
>     Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory