Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description

Hi Eric,
Thanks for this suggestion,
  I like the idea to reuse the duv:UsageTool, however, I am not sure that
the quality checking can be considered a usage itself: I tend to think that
 users check the quality to see if a dataset is good enough to fit for a
certain usage, which implies that quality checking is not exactly a
"proper" kind of usage   as it seems required in UsageTool...

I wonder if something like ADMS.SW [1] can apply here,  even if I have to
admit  that I won't  have the time to go through such a complex vocabulary.

Considering that  so far we have not discussed  any specific vocabulary
 for documenting software and services in details, and  that  we are
probably not in the position to have a proper discussion on that due to the
lack of time, I would consider the recommendation of   a specific
vocabulary for documenting software and services out of the DQV scope.

I simply propose to  replace in the two provenance examples  the current
comment

   # We should probably suggest to add more info about the services

with something like

# Further details about quality services/software can be provided, for
example, deploying  vocabularies such as Data Usage Vocabulary (DUV),
 Dublin Core or  ADMS.SW.

Could this work?
Riccardo

[1]https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms_foss/description


On 29 March 2016 at 18:02, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Riccardo,
>
> Would it be appropriate to use the Data Usage Vocab for this as a
> UsageTool?
>
> Eric
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have just added in DQV an example we have planned since quite a long,
> the  example about "the provenance of single quality measurement", see
> [1].
> Please take a look and let me know your comments/ corrections.
>
> Now we have two main provenance examples, the aformenetioned and the one
> about provenanc
> bout  the provenance of the quality metadata[2]. In both,   the quality
> measurements are    generated by  :qualityChecker, which is a Software
> agent  defined as in the following
>
> :qualityChecker
>     a prov:SoftwareAgent ;
>     rdfs:label "a quality assessment service"^^xsd:string
>     .
>
>
> I wonder if for the sake of reproducibility, we should suggest to add more
> details about the service/software which has generated the measurement, for
> example,  an URL or some information about sw version and so on.
> Does anyone of you know a good rdf vocab that can help in specifying a
> little more the software/service?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Cheers,
> Riccardo
>
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#DocumentProvSingleQM
> [2]
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#DocumentProvenanceQualityMetadata
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Riccardo Albertoni
> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
> Magenes"
> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
> www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf