Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP

Well spotted. Thanks, Andrea!

Antoine

On 3/8/16 11:43 AM, Andrea Perego wrote:
> Many thanks, Antoine.
>
> About the ttl example, you could also refer to the current version of GeoDCAT-AP, and add the URL of the relevant page:
>
> ex:geoDCAT-AP a dcterms:Standard;
>    dcterms:title "GeoDCAT Application Profile. Version 1.0" ;
>    dcterms:comment "GeoDCAT-AP is developed in the context of the Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA) Programme"@en;
>    dcterms:issued "2015-12-23"^^xsd:date ;
>    foaf:page <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/asset_release/geodcat-ap-v10> .
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrea
>
>
> On 08/03/2016 9:06, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> I've updated our section at
>> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#ExpressConformanceWithStandard
>> to reflect this.
>>
>> I hope it is fine,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> On 3/7/16 3:09 PM, Andrea Perego wrote:
>>> Thanks for this, Antoine.
>>>
>>> Please see my comments inline.
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2016 11:21, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>>> Dear Andrea,
>>>>
>>>> Again, my turn for being late...
>>>>
>>>> Actually your email was very long, I'm going to split it.
>>>>
>>>> On items #1 and #2 I believe we're almost set.
>>>> May I however ask you to check two last things?
>>>>
>>>> - what's the proper way to refer to the GeoDCAT-AP doc. Our referenced
>>>> at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#bib-GeoDCAT-AP is a bit old.
>>>> I see there's a PDF at [1], but it's always a bit confusing, as the PDF
>>>> itself mentions https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/node/148281
>>>
>>> I suggest you use the following:
>>>
>>> EU ISA Programme. GeoDCAT-AP: A geospatial extension for the DCAT
>>> application profile for data portals in Europe. Version 1.0. 23
>>> December 2015. URL:
>>> https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/asset_release/geodcat-ap-v10
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, the two URLs redirect to the same page - and they should be
>>> both persistent.
>>>
>>>> - whether we can/should refer to the 'provisional' PROV pattern you
>>>> mentioned for conformance. This is possible as an additional sentence at
>>>> [2].
>>>
>>> I think you can safely refer to it. This will stay in the GeoDCAT-AP
>>> specification, and, also in case it will be revised, this will be done
>>> by ensuring backward compatibility.
>>>
>>>> And if yes, whether indeed we're talking about Annex II.14 (p62
>>>> onwards) in the document at [1].
>>>
>>> Yep. That's the right section and page range.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 16:59:26 UTC