- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:41:53 +0100
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, Related to the discussions on Issue-199 and Action-203 [1], we have created a new DQV section with an example of using ODRL to describe instances of dqv:QualityPolicy http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#ExpressConformanceWithPolicy About the main point for Issue-199, i.e whether dqv:QualityPolicy should be a subclass of dcterms:Standard. Some policies will be very specific: we envision some could be instances of odrl:Agreement and odrl:Offer that represent bilateral contracts between parties. While the definition of dcterms:Standard could be understood to cover it [2], we think it is far stretched that to consider that specific bilateral agreements could be called 'standards'. The label of the class is really a big obstacle here. So we suggest to *not* declare dqv:QualityPolicy should be a subclass of dcterms:Standard. But adding a note that some instances of dqv:QualityPolicy could be also instances of dcterms:Standard, i.e. when their status of reference is official enough. Best Antoine and Riccardo [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/199 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/203 [2] http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-Standard "A basis for comparison; a reference point against which other things can be evaluated"
Received on Monday, 14 March 2016 08:42:31 UTC