- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:46:32 -0300
- To: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANx1PzxHy9mn1bi2o9+XbePypzofNkL4jjncMDszF2gMOpjJwA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I think that subsetting is an important subject and we should talk about it. However, I don't agree with keeping the BP [1]. I agree with Laufer that the "Possible Approach of Implementation" is too narrow and it should be improved. I also think that it's gonna be really hard to test this BP because the "How to test" is also very subjective. "Compare your assessment of the expected use cases and check that each of the subsets that you expect to be requested can be returned from a single identifier. Check also that the granularity of subsetting is consistent throughout the dataset." How someone can identify each one of the subsets that are expected to be requested? What is a subset? What is the granularity of subsetting? I think that if we're gonna use these terms than they should have a "more concrete" definition. Cheers, Berna [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#EnableDataSubsetting 2016-03-23 8:37 GMT-03:00 Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>: > Hi, > > I agree that we should keep the BP on Data Subsetting. > > While using an API (or SPARQL endpoint, etc. ) is a best practice for > grabbing a subset of a larger dataset, a lot of issues people are facing > around this topic is how to model sub-datasets in DCAT, and how to > represent them in CKAN. > > Therefore, I suggest the example section include not only an API example, > but also an example using DataCube and DCAT. > Otherwise, we should explicitly say it's not best practice to model > subsetting in DCAT. > > Cheers, > Deirdre > > > On 23/03/2016 03:23, Laufer wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > Considering that we have a BP "Provide bulk download", it makes sense to > also have a BP about providing "subset download". > > My comment is about the "Possible Approach of Implementation" that I think > is too narrow, talking only about an API as a way of access to subsets. > > I think it would be nice to talk about URI Templates (RFC6570), Linked > Data API [2] and even about a SPARQL endpoint as possible approaches of > implementations for accessing subsets. > > Cheers, Laufer > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6570 > > [2] http://www.epimorphics.com/web/projects/linked-data-api > > > -- > > . . . .. . . > . . . .. > . .. . > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------ > Deirdre Lee, CEO & Founder > Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions > > Web: www.derilinx.com > Email: deirdre@derilinx.com > Address: 11/12 Baggot Court, Dublin 2, D02 F891 > Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 > Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > Twitter: @deirdrelee > > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2016 12:47:21 UTC