ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2016 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2016

• Re: Questions and comments on CH Ilya Grigorik
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Martin Thomson
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Julian Reschke
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4645) Barry Leiba
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 30 March 2016

• Re: Questions and comments on CH Göran Eriksson AP
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-00 feedback Ilya Grigorik
• Re: Questions and comments on CH Ilya Grigorik
• ANN: drafts discussing Secure Content Delegation (aka "blind caches") Julian Reschke
• Re: Questions and comments on CH Göran Eriksson AP
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-00 feedback Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Julian Reschke
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-00 feedback Ilya Grigorik

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

• Re: Questions and comments on CH Ilya Grigorik
• draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-00 feedback Julian Reschke
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4646) Barry Leiba
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7540 (4645) RFC Errata System
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4647) Barry Leiba
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4647) Martin Thomson
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4646) Martin Thomson
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4645) Martin Thomson
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4647) RFC Errata System
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4646) RFC Errata System
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4645) RFC Errata System

Saturday, 26 March 2016

• Re: FYI: Chrome plans to ship an implementation of same-site cookies. Mark Nottingham

Friday, 25 March 2016

• Questions and comments on CH Göran Eriksson AP
• Re: FYI: Chrome plans to ship an implementation of same-site cookies. Roy T. Fielding
• Re: FYI: Chrome plans to ship an implementation of same-site cookies. Phil Lello
• Re: FYI: Chrome plans to ship an implementation of same-site cookies. David Morris
• Re: FYI: Chrome plans to ship an implementation of same-site cookies. Phil Lello
• FYI: Chrome plans to ship an implementation of same-site cookies. Mike West

Tuesday, 22 March 2016

• IPR Disclosure Glassey?McNeil's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding, draft-ietf-pkix-x509-ipaddr-as-extn, and draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-01 IETF Secretariat

Thursday, 24 March 2016

• Re: Retrying failed POSTs [was: Retry safety of HTTP requests] Phil Lello
• Re: Retrying failed POSTs [was: Retry safety of HTTP requests] Willy Tarreau
• Re: Retrying failed POSTs [was: Retry safety of HTTP requests] Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 23 March 2016

• Retrying failed POSTs [was: Retry safety of HTTP requests] Mark Nottingham
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Erik Nygren
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Wenbo Zhu
• RE: Retry safety of HTTP requests Subodh Iyengar
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Phil Lello
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests David Morris
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Martin Thomson
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Mark Nottingham
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Martin Thomson
• RE: Retry safety of HTTP requests Subodh Iyengar
• RE: Retry safety of HTTP requests Mike Bishop
• Re: Junk email Mark Nottingham
• Junk email Dave Wain
• RE: Retry safety of HTTP requests Subodh Iyengar
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Martin Thomson
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 22 March 2016

• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Patrick McManus

Thursday, 17 March 2016

• draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Kari Hurtta

Monday, 21 March 2016

• Summary of my answers | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Kari Hurtta
• Summary of my answers | Re: 160 Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Kari Hurtta

Tuesday, 22 March 2016

• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Amos Jeffries
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Cory Benfield
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Willy Tarreau
• RE: Retry safety of HTTP requests Subodh Iyengar
• RE: Retry safety of HTTP requests Subodh Iyengar
• Re: Retry safety of HTTP requests Amos Jeffries
• Retry safety of HTTP requests Subodh Iyengar

Monday, 21 March 2016

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-01.txt Martin Thomson
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Friday, 18 March 2016

• RE: 160 Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Mike Bishop
• Re: Decomposing HTTP Stefan Eissing
• Re: 160 Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Kari Hurtta
• 160 Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Martin Thomson
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Mark Nottingham
• Re: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Martin Thomson

Thursday, 17 March 2016

• RE: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mike Bishop
• RE: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mike Bishop
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Willy Tarreau
• Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04 Mark Nottingham
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Martin Thomson
• Re: [Moderator Action] #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Mark Nottingham
• Re: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Nick Sullivan

Wednesday, 16 March 2016

• RE: GOAWAY from a client Mike Bishop
• Re: GOAWAY from a client Kulkarni, Saurabh
• Re: GOAWAY from a client Mark Nottingham
• RE: GOAWAY from a client Mike Bishop
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Adrien de Croy
• RE: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Mike Bishop
• GOAWAY from a client Kulkarni, Saurabh
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Daniel Stenberg
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Roy T. Fielding
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Mark Nottingham
• Re: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Phil Lello
• Re: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Patrick McManus
• RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Daniel Stenberg
• RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Daniel Stenberg
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Amos Jeffries
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Michael Sweet
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Willy Tarreau
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Amos Jeffries
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Michael Sweet
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Xiaoyin Liu
• Re: SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Cory Benfield
• SNI vs Host: and a trailing dot Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Stefan Eissing
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Stefan Eissing
• Re: Rough agenda for B-A Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Patrick McManus

Tuesday, 15 March 2016

• Call for Adoption: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mark Nottingham
• Re: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mark Nottingham
• Decomposing HTTP Mike Bishop
• RE: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mike Bishop

Monday, 14 March 2016

• Re: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mark Nottingham
• RE: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mike Bishop
• Re: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Martin Thomson
• FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-02.txt Mike Bishop
• RE: Mixed http2/1.1 Authentication Mike Bishop
• RE: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Mike Bishop
• draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame Patrick McManus
• RE: [Moderator Action] #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Mike Bishop

Friday, 11 March 2016

• httpbis - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 95 \

Sunday, 13 March 2016

• Re: [Moderator Action] #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Kari Hurtta

Monday, 14 March 2016

• Re: HTTP/2 - Unintended consequences of pseudo-mandatory TLS Poul-Henning Kamp

Sunday, 13 March 2016

• Re: HTTP/2 - Unintended consequences of pseudo-mandatory TLS Mark Nottingham
• Re: HTTP/2 - Unintended consequences of pseudo-mandatory TLS Daniel Stenberg
• Re: HTTP/2 - Unintended consequences of pseudo-mandatory TLS Willy Tarreau
• HTTP/2 - Unintended consequences of pseudo-mandatory TLS Phil Lello
• Re: Mixed http2/1.1 Authentication Amos Jeffries

Saturday, 12 March 2016

• Re: Mixed http2/1.1 Authentication Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Mixed http2/1.1 Authentication Dennis Olvany
• Re: Mixed http2/1.1 Authentication Ilari Liusvaara
• Mixed http2/1.1 Authentication Dennis Olvany

Friday, 11 March 2016

• Last Call: <draft-alakuijala-brotli-08.txt> (Brotli Compressed Data Format) to Informational RFC The IESG
• Last Call: <draft-alakuijala-brotli-08.txt> DraftTracker Mail System
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv Cory Benfield
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv Willy Tarreau
• Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv Mark Nottingham
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 10 March 2016

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4636) Barry Leiba
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4636) RFC Errata System

Tuesday, 8 March 2016

• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Leif Hedstrom
• Re: MutualAuth: Looking for Volunteers Yoav Nir
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-14.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Protocol Action: 'HTTP Alternative Services' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13.txt) The IESG
• MutualAuth: Looking for Volunteers Yoav Nir
• Rough agenda for B-A Mark Nottingham
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Martin Thomson
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Mark Nottingham

Monday, 7 March 2016

• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Adam Barth
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Mike West
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Mike West
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Francesco Chemolli
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Mike West
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Amos Jeffries
• Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Amos Jeffries
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Leif Hedstrom
• Fwd: IETF 95 Preliminary Agenda Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 6 March 2016

• RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Daniel Stenberg
• RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Salvatore Loreto

Saturday, 5 March 2016

• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Yoshifumi Nishida
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: [tcpm] Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Yoshifumi Nishida
• Re: [tcpm] Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Ben Niven-Jenkins

Friday, 4 March 2016

• Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Benoit Claise

Thursday, 3 March 2016

• Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Benoit Claise

Saturday, 5 March 2016

• [Reposted to list] Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Kari Hurtta
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (4634) RFC Errata System
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4634) RFC Errata System
• Re: [tcpm] Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: [tcpm] Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Tim Wicinski

Friday, 4 March 2016

• Re: [tcpm] Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Mark Nottingham
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Patrick McManus
• Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Erik Nygren
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Patrick McManus
• Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Stephen Farrell
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Proposal: Cookie Priorities Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 3 March 2016

• Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Patrick McManus
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• Proposal: Cookie Priorities Mike West
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 2 March 2016

• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Joe Touch
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Kari Hurtta
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Kari Hurtta
• #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Kari Hurtta
• Re: Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Ben Campbell
• RE: Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Mike Bishop
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Kari Hurtta
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Kari Hurtta
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Thomas Mangin
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Thomas Mangin
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Thomas Mangin
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Cory Benfield
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Tim Wicinski
• Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Willy Tarreau
• Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP Mark Nottingham
• Re: #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Martin Thomson
• #144: Attacks from Same Host (OppSec) Mark Nottingham
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-key-01.txt Mark Nottingham
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-key-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT) Ben Campbell

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Thomas Mangin

Sunday, 28 February 2016

• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Kari Hurtta

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Kari Hurtta
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Kari Hurtta

Monday, 29 February 2016

• Server Push scenarios derandreaslangner@web.de

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

• Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Stephen Farrell
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC 7725 on An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles Martin J. Dürst
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Amos Jeffries
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Ted Hardie

Monday, 29 February 2016

• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Mark Nottingham
• RFC 7725 on An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Ted Hardie
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Thomas Mangin
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Martin Thomson

Sunday, 28 February 2016

• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Julian Reschke

Saturday, 27 February 2016

• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Mark Nottingham
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Barry Leiba

Friday, 26 February 2016

• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Roy T. Fielding
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Mark Nottingham
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Mark Nottingham
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Roy T. Fielding
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Barry Leiba
• Alt-Svc and HTTP/2 with Prior Knowledge | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Kari Hurtta
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Mark Nottingham
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Julian Reschke
• Re: Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Mark Nottingham
• Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Mark Nottingham
• Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Martin Thomson

Thursday, 25 February 2016

• Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Mark Nottingham
• Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT) Alissa Cooper
• Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Julian Reschke
• Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Mark Nottingham
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: Fwd: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-alone-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-prefixes-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 22 February 2016

• Re: Fwd: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Julian Reschke
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Mike West
• Re: Progress on Cookies Mike West
• Re: Cookies: Integration with external specs. Mike West
• Progress on Cookies Mark Nottingham
• Cookies and Pervasive Monitoring Mark Nottingham
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 21 February 2016

• Fwd: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 20 February 2016

• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Martin Thomson
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Mark Nottingham
• Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Martin Thomson
• #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C Mark Nottingham

Friday, 19 February 2016

• Re: Harmonizing draft-west-cookie-prefixes-05 with the web origin concept Emily Stark (Dunn)
• Re: Question about error code 451 and internet censorship Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Question about error code 451 and internet censorship A.K. Sharma
• Question about error code 451 and internet censorship Philippe-Joseph Salazar

Thursday, 11 February 2016

• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Mike Bishop
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Amos Jeffries
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Barry Leiba

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Mike Bishop
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Kari Hurtta

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

• draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Kari Hurtta

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt> (HTTP Alternative Services) to Proposed Standard The IESG
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Alcides Viamontes E
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

• RE: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Lucas Pardue
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Alcides Viamontes E
• Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Alcides Viamontes E
• Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Simone Bordet
• Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Glen Knowles
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4616) Mark Nottingham
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4616) RFC Errata System

Monday, 8 February 2016

• Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Patrick McManus
• RE: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Mike Bishop

Sunday, 7 February 2016

• Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Simone Bordet
• Re: Recursive HTTP/2 Push Daniel Stenberg
• Recursive HTTP/2 Push Simone Bordet

Friday, 5 February 2016

• Re: HTTP/2 over QUIC ? Ryan Hamilton
• Re: HTTP/2 over QUIC ? Martin Thomson

Thursday, 4 February 2016

• Re: HTTP/2 as a possible technology for the hackathon to work on Mark Nottingham
• HTTP/2 as a possible technology for the hackathon to work on Barry Leiba
• HTTP/2 over QUIC ? =JeffH
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 3 February 2016

• RE: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Mike Bishop
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-11.txt Julian Reschke
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-11.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Amos Jeffries
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Richard Bradbury
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Eliezer Croitoru
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku

Sunday, 31 January 2016

• I-D Action: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Thursday, 28 January 2016

• Re: CONTINUATION frames on half-closed streams? Joe DeVivo

Friday, 29 January 2016

• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Amos Jeffries

Thursday, 28 January 2016

• RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Mike Bishop
• RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Mike Bishop
• Re: CONTINUATION frames on half-closed streams? Martin Thomson
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: Padding and record sizes in draft-thomson-http-encryption Martin Thomson
• CONTINUATION frames on half-closed streams? Joe DeVivo
• RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Mike Bishop
• Re: Padding and record sizes in draft-thomson-http-encryption Peter Beverloo
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: Padding and record sizes in draft-thomson-http-encryption Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 27 January 2016

• RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Mike Bishop
• RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Mike Bishop
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Kazuho Oku
• Padding and record sizes in draft-thomson-http-encryption Peter Beverloo
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Abbreviation form for HTTP JSON Header Field Values? Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Eliezer Croitoru
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Mike Bishop

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Ilari Liusvaara
• FW: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http2-client-certs-01.txt Mike Bishop

Monday, 25 January 2016

• I-D Action: draft-west-first-party-cookies-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 24 January 2016

• Re: Abbreviation form for HTTP JSON Header Field Values? Julian Reschke

Friday, 22 January 2016

• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Richard Bradbury
• Abbreviation form for HTTP JSON Header Field Values? Kazuho Oku

Thursday, 21 January 2016

• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Mike West
• I-D Action: draft-west-first-party-cookies-05.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku

Wednesday, 20 January 2016

• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Cookies: Integration with external specs. Mark Nottingham
• New non-WG mailing list Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Matthew Kerwin
• RE: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Mike Bishop
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Mike West
• Re: Cookies: Integration with external specs. Mike West
• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Cookies: Integration with external specs. Mark Nottingham

Monday, 18 January 2016

• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Matthew Kerwin
• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Patrick McManus
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Mike West
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Kari Hurtta
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Julian Reschke
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Cookies: Integration with external specs. Mike West
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Mike West
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Defining First and Third Party Cookies Matthew Kerwin
• Defining First and Third Party Cookies Mark Nottingham
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku

Sunday, 17 January 2016

• httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 95 \
• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Mark Nottingham
• Buenos Aires Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 16 January 2016

• RE: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Mike Bishop
• Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Patrick McManus
• non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10) Patrick McManus
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Chris Bentzel
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Patrick McManus
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson

Friday, 15 January 2016

• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Chris Bentzel
• RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Chris Bentzel
• Re: (Possibly duplicate mail) Suggesting /.well-known/alternative-services as compromise | Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Dave Wain
• RE: (Possibly duplicate mail) Suggesting /.well-known/alternative-services as compromise | Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
• Re: (Possibly duplicate mail) Suggesting /.well-known/alternative-services as compromise | Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 14 January 2016

• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Ilya Grigorik
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Cory Benfield
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Erik Nygren
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 13 January 2016

• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Erik Nygren
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Julian Reschke
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Ilya Grigorik
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
• RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Amos Jeffries
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba

Tuesday, 12 January 2016

• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Amos Jeffries
• RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
• RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Stefan Eissing
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Alcides Viamontes E
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Brief History of Web Sessions (95/96) Willy Tarreau
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
• Re: Brief History of Web Sessions (95/96) Dave Wain

Monday, 11 January 2016

• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Stephen Farrell
• RE: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mike Bishop
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Kyle Rose
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Ilya Grigorik
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Chris Bentzel
• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Cory Benfield
• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 10 January 2016

• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Alex Rousskov
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Barry Leiba
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Alcides Viamontes E
• Re: Alt-Svc WGLC Julian Reschke
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke

Saturday, 9 January 2016

• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Alex Rousskov
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku

Friday, 8 January 2016

• Re: Brief History of Web Sessions (95/96) Dave Wain
• Re: Brief History of Web Sessions (95/96) Robert Collins
• Re: Brief History of Web Sessions (95/96) Dave Wain
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Alex Rousskov
• Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2 Kazuho Oku

Thursday, 7 January 2016

• Re: HTTP/2 and HTTPS BICYCLE attack Martin Thomson
• RE: GOAWAY after GOAWAY Mike Bishop
• GOAWAY after GOAWAY Stefan Eissing
• Re: Harmonizing draft-west-cookie-prefixes-05 with the web origin concept Mike West
• Re: Harmonizing draft-west-cookie-prefixes-05 with the web origin concept Mike West
• Re: considerations for draft-west-leave-secure-cookies-alone-04 Mike West
• Re: HTTP/2 and HTTPS BICYCLE attack Ilari Liusvaara
• RE: HTTP/2 and HTTPS BICYCLE attack Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
• Re: HTTP/2 and HTTPS BICYCLE attack Martin Thomson
• RE: Range requests and content encoding K.Morgan@iaea.org
• HTTP/2 and HTTPS BICYCLE attack Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group

Wednesday, 6 January 2016

• Re: Range requests and content encoding Roy T. Fielding
• Re: alt-svc and proxies Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 5 January 2016

• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke
• RE: Range requests and content encoding K.Morgan@iaea.org
• RE: alt-svc and proxies Piotr Galecki

Monday, 4 January 2016

• Re: alt-svc and proxies Martin Thomson
• alt-svc and proxies Piotr Galecki

Sunday, 3 January 2016

• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham
• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Martin Thomson
• Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Brief History of Web Sessions (95/96) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Brief History of Web Sessions (95/96) Dave Wain
• Re: ABNF related feedback to: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10 Julian Reschke

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2016 19:59:28 UTC