- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:45:36 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2016-02-22 00:43, Mark Nottingham wrote: > FYI; we got a secdir review of alt-svc, with some editorial issues. > > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> >> Subject: Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12 >> Date: 22 February 2016 at 10:42:02 AM AEDT >> To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> >> Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc.all@tools.ietf.org >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for the review. See: >> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/23d3b09374c077 >> ... I'm not totally OK with all the edits, for instance we now have normative language in notes, and a lowercase "required" has sneaked in. Will review tomorrow. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 22 February 2016 17:46:04 UTC