- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:29:03 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
On 31 March 2016 at 17:54, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > I believe this needs to be rephrased to better explain the actual problem; > and I also remain unconvinced that the conclusion wrt HTTP/1.1 makes sense. Maybe I'm a little too close to this now. I can't see how I might rephrase this differently. Do you have a suggestion? I also would prefer not to have a carve-out for HTTP/1.1 here. If you want to ask the question again, I look to our chair (and shepherd) for guidance.
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2016 07:29:31 UTC