- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:33:15 +1100
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, jingzl@microsoft.com, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 29 March 2016 at 19:19, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > 2 editorial issues in section 5.1 and section 11.2. Valid. Though neither demand a change. Lowercase "may" is acceptable, though perhaps a poor choice of word in context. And s/Section/Specification aligns better with the registration template, but worse with the document itself. We should mark this "Hold for document update"
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 08:33:44 UTC