- From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 02:59:03 -0500
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I support this for adoption. My only current comment is the draft currently does not seem to make any requirements (ala 2119). When DNSOP revisited RFC5966 - DNS Transport over TCP - Implementation Requirements - last year https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis/ DNSOP was able to come to rough consensus on recommendations. I feel httpbis can also come to such consensus. I like BCP but I've gotten some pushback from my co-workers who feel it's too early in the /2 deployment for the best practices to be honed. tim On 3/2/16 12:46 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > [ copying Alison as our Transport Tech Advisor ] > > Daniel has kindly started a document about how HTTP uses TCP, both for /1 and /2: > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stenberg-httpbis-tcp> > > We haven't explicitly discussed this at a meeting, but I have heard interest in this topic from a variety of folks. > > What do people think about adopting this with a target of Best Current Practice? > > Please comment on-list. > > Regards, > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 07:59:34 UTC