- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:29:00 +1100
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, jingzl@microsoft.com, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 29 March 2016 at 19:05, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > According to the description above and the state transformation in Figure 2, a stream in the 'idle' state could receive a PUSH_PROMISE frame. Do we have a Most Often Reported Erratum award? The text says "another stream" and has a note that explains this, and yet the diagram is still causing problems. As reported, this is invalid. Can we close this as a duplicate and reference Erratum 4535?
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 08:29:29 UTC