- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:38:51 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@mozilla.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 18 January 2016 06:39:41 UTC
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > It doesn't look like there's enough interest in Mike's first-party cookie > draft to consider a CfA for it yet. > I do plan to ship an implementation of first-party-only in Chrome in the relatively near future; I think it's a solid measure against CSRF, and folks like GitHub are already experimenting with Chrome's flagged implementation. I'm hopeful that Mozilla will find time to do the same. +mgoodwin in the hopes that he can pass on Mozilla's perspective. > However, I'm wondering if it would be useful to pull the definitions of > first and third party cookies out of that and into CookieBIS, since they're > currently not defined anywhere normatively. > > Specifically: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-first-party-cookies-04#section-2.1 > > What do people think? > I think that's a pretty reasonable suggestion if there's not enough interest in the rest of the proposal. -mike
Received on Monday, 18 January 2016 06:39:41 UTC