- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:27:12 +0100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:32:38PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 22/03/2016 6:55 p.m., Subodh Iyengar wrote: > > HTTP/1.1 and the current HTTP/2 spec don't define the concept of > > retry safety of requests, i.e. when are requests are safe to retry > > and what are the limits on how retries can be performed by the lower > > layers. > > > RFC 7230 section 6.3.1 titled "Retrying Requests" > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-6.3.1> > > The criteria for *when* are outlined. > > The *how* is not possible to be defined at the HTTP layer IMO. There are > just so many possible ways. Up to and including things like RFC 1149 > Avian Carrier protocol as fallback. > > So the "how" is application and indeed message specific and should be > defined at those upper layers. HTTP already provides a number of > mechanisms such as; GET, HEAD methods and/or ETag, If-*, Range headers, > etc. which can be used by the application layer to check the state > before its chosen method of retry (if wanted). Also for POST requests, Expect: 100-continue provides an easy way to probe the connection and to ensure idempotence in case of failure. Willy
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2016 09:27:47 UTC