Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C

On 29 February 2016 at 03:53, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
>
> Well, "reasonable assurances" can be protocol
> element.


They are not currently, though if we wanted them to be, then we could
write a document that updates this one to do that.  That document
might then define a registry.  No point in overengineering here.

Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 01:00:29 UTC