- From: Joe DeVivo <joe@devivo.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:14:00 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 07:47:01 UTC
That makes perfect sense, and means less work for me :D Thanks! On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com <mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>> wrote: On 29 January 2016 at 07:40, Joe DeVivo <joe@devivo.com <mailto:joe@devivo.com>> wrote: > But, the two statements above make me think that a half-closed stream could > also send one or more CONTINUATION frames if it first sends a HEADERS frame > with the END_STREAM flag set, but not the END_HEADERS flag set. Here's how to think of it (and this is in your first quote): A CONTINUATION frame is just part of the previous HEADERS frame. The stream is only half-closed AFTER the frame is completely sent, which includes any CONTINUATION frames. Note that Section 5.1 also says: > In this regard, CONTINUATION frames do not result in state transitions; they are effectively part of the HEADERS or PUSH_PROMISE that they follow. For the purpose of state transitions, the END_STREAM flag is processed as a separate event to the frame that bears it; a HEADERS frame with the END_STREAM flag set can cause two state transitions.
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 07:47:01 UTC