Re: Call for Adoption: draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame

Hi Stefan,

> On 16 Mar 2016, at 8:04 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> 
> Interested to support this in Apache httpd.
> 
> The handling of 421 responses is not the same for all clients. This has caused some problems in deployment where not all sites listed in a cert enjoy the same TLS configuration. With renegotiation not possible, a server can only 421 such a request.

Can you expand upon this a bit? What differences are you seeing?

> 
> My hope for an ORIGIN frame is that the server can indicate which hosts *really* are mixable on the connection and clients can refrain from second guessing from alternate names only.
> 
> -Stefan
> 
>> Am 16.03.2016 um 01:16 schrieb Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>:
>> 
>> as noted, I'm in favor and interested in where this can go.
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-origin-frame-01>
>> 
>> As we've seen, there's some implementer interest in this, and in previous discussions, there seem to have been support for it. Our AD is aware of it and supportive of its adoption.
>> 
>> If you'd like to express support for it or reservations about adopting it, please do so; we'll make a decision shortly.
>> 
>> Since I'm an author on the document, Mike Bishop has graciously agreed to act as Document Shepherd and judge consensus for it.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 09:09:01 UTC