- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:56:03 +1100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
- Cc: HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I've taken a stab at this: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/f1024d233157e Please review. Cheers, > On 20 Feb 2016, at 1:44 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 19 February 2016 at 18:40, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> "For the purposes of this document, "reasonable assurances" can be established through use of a TLS-based protocol with the certificate checks defined in RFC2818. Other means of establishing them MUST be documented in an RFC that updates this specification. Clients MAY impose additional criteria for establishing reasonable assurances." > > That looks good. I don't think that it helps to note that in practice > "MAY" becomes "will". > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 00:56:33 UTC