- From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:52:56 +1000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Received on Friday, 4 March 2016 00:53:32 UTC
On 04/03/2016 10:09 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > Thanks, Mike. > > As I understand it, this is already implemented in one browser, which is good in that we're looking for implementation. > > What do folks -- both other browser implementers and site folks -- think about this? > It's a practical issue with a simple (demonstrated) improvement. And hints like this usually fall under "handy at best, harmless at worst" so I see no harm in and of itself. That said, maybe I've been listening to PHK for too long, but I wonder if all these cookie patches aren't just putting band-aids over a fundamentally flawed system. How many (and how big) cookies do you need to receive before this priority comes to the fore?
Received on Friday, 4 March 2016 00:53:32 UTC