- From: Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa-networks.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:16:36 +0000
- To: hurtta@siilo.fmi.fi
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP WG" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "Kari Hurtta" <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
> any header would pass through towards the origin and then could be > used by another non-configured proxy down the line. clarification: it should read ‘could pass’ and not ‘would pass’. While section 14.10 of RFC 2616 / 6.1 of RFC 7230 does have a rule for header stripping, it may not be correctly implemented by proxies. To be perfectly honest, I just had a look at my/our own code and we did not implement it - patch pending :-(. However as long as any proxy implementing the draft does follow this rule it looks like a good solution. Thomas
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 10:17:25 UTC