ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2008: by thread

i74 proposal take 2 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 28 March)
- Re: i74 proposal take 2 Frank Ellermann (Friday, 28 March)
  - Re: i74 proposal take 2 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 28 March)
- Re: i74 proposal take 2 Julian Reschke (Friday, 28 March)
  - Re: i74 proposal take 2 Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 29 March)
    - Re: i74 proposal take 2 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 29 March)
HTTPBis Summary Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 26 March)
PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 25 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 25 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 26 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 26 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 26 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Martin Duerst (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Albert Lunde (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Martin Duerst (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Martin Duerst (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 29 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Robert Brewer (Wednesday, 26 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 27 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Robert Brewer (Thursday, 27 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Martin Duerst (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Martin Duerst (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 27 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Robert Brewer (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Frank Ellermann (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Frank Ellermann (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 29 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 29 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Robert Sayre (Saturday, 29 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Stefan Eissing (Saturday, 29 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Saturday, 29 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers David Morris (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Frank Ellermann (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 31 March)
    - UTF-8 (was: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers) Frank Ellermann (Monday, 31 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Stefan Eissing (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Stefan Eissing (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Stefan Eissing (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 28 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Jamie Lokier (Friday, 28 March)
HttpOnly Jim Manico (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: HttpOnly Daniel Stenberg (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: HttpOnly Jim Manico (Tuesday, 18 March)
  - Re: HttpOnly Carsten Bormann (Wednesday, 19 March)
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 18 March)
  - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 19 March)
HTTPBIS Summary Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Julian Reschke (Monday, 17 March)
  - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Martin Duerst (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 19 March)
    - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Robert Siemer (Wednesday, 19 March)
    - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 19 March)
    - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Nicolas Alvarez (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
  - Re: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 18 March)
PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Stefan Eissing (Monday, 17 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Julian Reschke (Monday, 17 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Brian Smith (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses John Kemp (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 19 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Stefan Eissing (Wednesday, 19 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 19 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 19 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Julian Reschke (Thursday, 20 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses David Morris (Thursday, 20 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 20 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Brian Smith (Thursday, 20 March)
    - RE: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 20 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 20 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 20 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Robert Siemer (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
307 Temporary Redirect Nicolas Alvarez (Sunday, 16 March)
- Re: 307 Temporary Redirect Julian Reschke (Sunday, 16 March)
  - Re: 307 Temporary Redirect Nicolas Alvarez (Sunday, 16 March)
- Re: 307 Temporary Redirect Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
POWDER Use Case (was Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases) Phil Archer (Thursday, 13 March)
HTTPBIS Summary Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Werner Baumann (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Werner Baumann (Saturday, 15 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 15 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Werner Baumann (Saturday, 15 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Robert Siemer (Sunday, 16 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Werner Baumann (Sunday, 16 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Robert Siemer (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Lisa Dusseault (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Robert Siemer (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Sunday, 9 March)
- Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Mark Nottingham (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Monday, 10 March)
  - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Monday, 10 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Martin Duerst (Friday, 14 March)
    - IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP (was: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases) Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP (was: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases) Brian Smith (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Brian Smith (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Brian Smith (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Brian Smith (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Mark Nottingham (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Stefan Eissing (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Frank Ellermann (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Stefan Eissing (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Frank Ellermann (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Julian Reschke (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Frank Ellermann (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Martin Duerst (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Frank Ellermann (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Phil Archer (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Mark Nottingham (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 17 March)
    - Link header field titles (was: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP) Frank Ellermann (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: Link header field titles Julian Reschke (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: Link header field titles Julian Reschke (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: Link header field titles Martin Duerst (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: Link header field titles Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Stefan Eissing (Friday, 14 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Brian Smith (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Friday, 14 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Brian Smith (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Friday, 14 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Brian Smith (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Frank Ellermann (Saturday, 15 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Brian Smith (Saturday, 15 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Frank Ellermann (Saturday, 15 March)
    - Content-Disposition filename encoding, was: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Julian Reschke (Sunday, 16 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding, was: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Julian Reschke (Sunday, 16 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Frank Ellermann (Sunday, 16 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Julian Reschke (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Frank Ellermann (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Julian Reschke (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Frank Ellermann (Monday, 24 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Julian Reschke (Monday, 24 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Frank Ellermann (Monday, 24 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding Julian Reschke (Monday, 24 March)
    - Re: Content-Disposition filename encoding, was: IRIs, IDNAbis, and ?HTTP [i74] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Martin Duerst (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP [i74] Frank Ellermann (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Friday, 14 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Brian Smith (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Saturday, 15 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Julian Reschke (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Monday, 17 March)
    - RE: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Paul Hoffman (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Martin Duerst (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: IRIs, IDNAbis, and HTTP Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 18 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Wednesday, 12 March)
- RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Wednesday, 12 March)
  - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Harry Halpin (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - RE: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Brian Smith (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 12 March)
- Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Mark Nottingham (Friday, 14 March)
  - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Mark Nottingham (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: Reviving HTTP Header Linking: Some code and use-cases Julian Reschke (Saturday, 15 March)
Indicating response errors after the status-line is sent Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: Indicating response errors after the status-line is sent Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
- Re: Indicating response errors after the status-line is sent Robert Siemer (Saturday, 15 March)
NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 5 March)
- RE: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Brian Smith (Wednesday, 5 March)
  - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 6 March)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Robert Siemer (Thursday, 6 March)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 6 March)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Robert Siemer (Thursday, 6 March)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 6 March)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Jamie Lokier (Friday, 7 March)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Adrien de Croy (Friday, 7 March)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE(S): Retrying Requests Jamie Lokier (Friday, 7 March)
Connection limits Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: Connection limits David Morris (Wednesday, 5 March)
  - RE: Connection limits Josh Cohen (MIG) (Wednesday, 5 March)
    - Re: Connection limits Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 5 March)
    - Re: Connection limits Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 5 March)
    - RE: Connection limits Eric Lawrence (Thursday, 6 March)
  - Re: Connection limits Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: Connection limits Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 6 March)
  - RE: Connection limits Eric Lawrence (Thursday, 6 March)
Re: NEW ISSUE: Monitoring Connections text Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 5 March)
HTTPBIS Summary Mark Nottingham (Monday, 3 March)
Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Mark Nottingham (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Robert Siemer (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Julian Reschke (Monday, 3 March)
  - Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - RE: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Brian Smith (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header Robert Siemer (Sunday, 16 March)
Transfer-Encoding:chunked szukw000@arcor.de (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: Transfer-Encoding:chunked Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
RE: i107 Brian Smith (Thursday, 28 February)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Thursday, 28 February)
- RE: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
  - RE: i107 Brian Smith (Friday, 14 March)
    - RE: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 14 March)
PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
  - Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Julian Reschke (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy David Morris (Thursday, 27 March)
i69: Requested Variant - moving forward Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: i69: Requested Variant - moving forward Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Robert Siemer (Thursday, 28 February)
  - Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response Dan Winship (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: New issue: 15.3 misguided? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Adrian Chadd (Thursday, 28 February)
  - Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Mark Nottingham (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: Suggestion for NEW Issue: Pipelining problems Robert Siemer (Monday, 3 March)
- Pipelining problems [i99] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
  - RE: Pipelining problems [i99] Josh Cohen (MIG) (Friday, 14 March)
Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 27 February)
  - RE: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - RE: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - RE: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: Unknown and misplaced headers as entity headers Brian Smith (Friday, 14 March)
- Header type defaulting [i104] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
Reclassification of Allow as a response header Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 February)
- Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
  - RE: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Brian Smith (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 28 February)
    - RE: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Brian Smith (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Stefan Eissing (Friday, 29 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Julian Reschke (Friday, 29 February)
    - Re: Reclassification of Allow as a response header [i105] Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
BIS -02 Drafts Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 26 February)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Friday, 22 February)
- Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer (Friday, 14 March)
  - Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Paul Hoffman (Saturday, 15 March)
    - Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Martin Duerst (Monday, 17 March)
    - Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer (Monday, 17 March)
  - Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Robert Siemer (Saturday, 15 March)
  - Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Paul Hoffman (Saturday, 15 March)
  - Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-01.txt Stephane Bortzmeyer (Monday, 17 March)
PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Julian Reschke (Saturday, 16 February)
- RE: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Brian Smith (Saturday, 16 February)
  - RE: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Brian Smith (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Julian Reschke (Saturday, 16 February)
    - RE: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Brian Smith (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Julian Reschke (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Content-* Semantics [i103] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - RE: Content-* Semantics [i103] Brian Smith (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Content-* Semantics [i103] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - RE: Content-* Semantics [i103] Brian Smith (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Content-* Semantics [i103] Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Content-* Semantics [i103] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Content-* Semantics [i103][i102] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: Content-* Semantics [i103] Robert Sayre (Thursday, 28 February)
    - FW: Content-* Semantics [i103] Brian Smith (Friday, 29 February)
    - Re: Content-* Semantics [i103] Frank Ellermann (Friday, 29 February)
    - Re: Content-* Semantics [i103] Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
    - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
  - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Julian Reschke (Saturday, 16 February)
  - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Subbu Allamaraju (Saturday, 16 February)
    - RE: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Brian Smith (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 16 February)
  - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Robert Sayre (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range James M Snell (Saturday, 16 February)
    - Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Robert Sayre (Saturday, 16 February)
- Re: PATCH vs multipart/byteranges vs Content-Range Adrien de Croy (Saturday, 16 February)
Access Control for Cross-site Requests WD Published Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 15 February)
Re: Fwd: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordström (Friday, 15 February)
- Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
  - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Stefan Eissing (Friday, 29 February)
    - RE: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Brian Smith (Friday, 29 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 29 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Robert Siemer (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Monday, 3 March)
    - RE: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Brian Smith (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses John Kemp (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses John Kemp (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses John Kemp (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Robert Sayre (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Baker (Monday, 3 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses John Kemp (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses John Kemp (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 4 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 14 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Friday, 29 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
Content negotiation for request bodies Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: Content negotiation for request bodies Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 14 February)
  - Re: Content negotiation for request bodies David Morris (Sunday, 24 February)
    - Re: Content negotiation for request bodies Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 24 February)
    - RE: Content negotiation for request bodies Brian Smith (Sunday, 24 February)
    - Re: Content negotiation for request bodies David Morris (Monday, 25 February)
    - Re: Content negotiation for request bodies Jamie Lokier (Monday, 25 February)
- Re: Content negotiation for request bodies Henrik Nordström (Sunday, 24 February)
  - RE: Content negotiation for request bodies Brian Smith (Sunday, 24 February)
    - RE: Content negotiation for request bodies Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
    - RE: Content negotiation for request bodies Brian Smith (Friday, 14 March)
- RE: Content negotiation for request bodies Brian Smith (Sunday, 24 February)
  - Re: Content negotiation for request bodies Jamie Lokier (Monday, 25 February)
  - Re: Content negotiation for request bodies Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 26 February)
    - Re: Content negotiation for request bodies Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 26 February)
    - RE: Content negotiation for request bodies Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 February)
Is Content-Range extensible? Subbu Allamaraju (Thursday, 14 February)
- RE: Is Content-Range extensible? Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
wildcards in digest auth domain field Tim Olsen (Thursday, 14 February)
- Re: wildcards in digest auth domain field Paul Hoffman (Thursday, 14 February)
  - Re: wildcards in digest auth domain field Tim Olsen (Thursday, 14 February)
i76: 305 Use Proxy Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: i76: 305 Use Proxy David Morris (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: i76: 305 Use Proxy Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
order of Accept-* and Server-Driven negotiation olivier Thereaux (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: order of Accept-* and Server-Driven negotiation Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 13 February)
- Re: order of Accept-* and Server-Driven negotiation Javier Godoy (Wednesday, 13 February)
ABNF conversion status (issue <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36>) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 February)
Description section removed from charter? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 8 February)
- Re: Description section removed from charter? David Morris (Friday, 8 February)
  - Re: Description section removed from charter? Mark Nottingham (Friday, 8 February)
FYI: Firefox 3 beta 4 will enable pipelining over https Robert Sayre (Thursday, 7 February)
503, 403 & Retry-After: enforcing a limit on the number of requests allowed Hugo Haas (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: 503, 403 & Retry-After: enforcing a limit on the number of ?requests allowed Henrik Nordström (Friday, 8 February)
Re: does no-store request invalidate? [i23] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: does no-store request invalidate? [i23] David Morris (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - Re: does no-store request invalidate? [i23] Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Baker (Tuesday, 5 February)
  - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Baker (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Robert Sayre (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Robert Sayre (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 5 February)
- Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Robert Sayre (Friday, 7 March)
  - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 12 March)
    - Re: i24: Requiring Allow in 405 responses Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 13 March)
CONNECT message including tunneled data Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 29 January)
- Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 29 January)
  - Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 31 January)
    - Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 31 January)
    - Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 31 January)
    - RE: CONNECT message including tunneled data Adrien de Croy (Friday, 1 February)
    - RE: CONNECT message including tunneled data Henrik Nordström (Friday, 1 February)
    - Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Jamie Lokier (Friday, 1 February)
    - Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Adrien de Croy (Friday, 1 February)
- Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 31 January)
- Re: CONNECT message including tunneled data Henrik Nordström (Friday, 1 February)
HTML5 vs content type sniffing Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 January)
- Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Frank Ellermann (Friday, 25 January)
  - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Robert Siemer (Friday, 25 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Frank Ellermann (Saturday, 26 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Ian Hickson (Monday, 28 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Robert Siemer (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 February)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Ian Hickson (Saturday, 2 February)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 February)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Ian Hickson (Saturday, 2 February)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 February)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Ian Hickson (Saturday, 2 February)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing David Morris (Monday, 4 February)
- Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 February)
  - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 February)
  - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: HTML5 vs content type sniffing Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 5 February)
Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 January)
- Re: Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 January)
new issue: mismatch between RFC2616 and RFC4234 CHAR definition Julian Reschke (Thursday, 24 January)
- Re: new issue: mismatch between RFC2616 and RFC4234 CHAR definition lists@ingostruck.de (Thursday, 24 January)
  - Re: new issue: mismatch between RFC2616 and RFC4234 CHAR definition lists@ingostruck.de (Thursday, 24 January)
    - Re: new issue: mismatch between RFC2616 and RFC4234 CHAR definition Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 24 January)
  - Re: new issue: mismatch between RFC2616 and RFC4234 CHAR definition Julian Reschke (Thursday, 24 January)
- Re: new issue: mismatch between RFC2616 and RFC4234 CHAR definition Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 24 January)
  - Re: new issue: mismatch between RFC2616 and RFC4234 CHAR definition Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 February)
Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Hoffman (Wednesday, 23 January)
- Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Stephane Bortzmeyer (Monday, 28 January)
  - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Hoffman (Monday, 28 January)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Stephane Bortzmeyer (Monday, 28 January)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Hoffman (Monday, 28 January)
    - RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Leach (Monday, 28 January)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 1 February)
    - RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Leach (Friday, 1 February)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 1 February)
- RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Leach (Monday, 28 January)
  - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Jamie Lokier (Monday, 28 January)
    - RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Leach (Monday, 28 January)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 29 January)
    - RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Leach (Wednesday, 30 January)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 31 January)
  - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Adrien de Croy (Monday, 28 January)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
- RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Robert Sayre (Thursday, 31 January)
  - RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Leach (Wednesday, 6 February)
    - Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Robert Sayre (Wednesday, 6 February)
- Re: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Robert Sayre (Sunday, 3 February)
  - RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Mike Dierken (Sunday, 3 February)
    - RE: Security Requirements for HTTP, draft -00 Paul Hoffman (Sunday, 3 February)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: PUT, side effects and 201 Created? [ i21 ] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 22 January)
- Re: PUT, side effects and 201 Created? [ i21 ] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 22 January)
  - Re: PUT, side effects and 201 Created? [ i21 ] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body [i19] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 22 January)
- Re: Request methods that allow an entity-body [i19] David Morris (Wednesday, 23 January)
HTTP 2.0: Request from server to clients at persistent connection Зимаков Павел (Friday, 18 January)
- RE: HTTP 2.0: Request from server to clients at persistent connection Mike Dierken (Sunday, 3 February)
- Re: HTTP 2.0: Request from server to clients at persistent connection Carsten Bormann (Sunday, 3 February)
  - RE: HTTP 2.0: Request from server to clients at persistent connection Mike Dierken (Monday, 4 February)
  - Re: HTTP 2.0: Request from server to clients at persistent connection Lisa Dusseault (Saturday, 9 February)
    - Re: HTTP 2.0: Request from server to clients at persistent connection Mark Baker (Saturday, 9 February)
Content-Length and 1xx status codes Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 17 January)
- Re: Content-Length and 1xx status codes Henrik Nordström (Thursday, 17 January)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Sunday, 13 January)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Sunday, 13 January)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Sunday, 13 January)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Sunday, 13 January)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Sunday, 13 January)
- Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-01.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 18 January)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Sunday, 13 January)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Sunday, 13 January)
Books about HTTP "spirit"? Robert Siemer (Sunday, 13 January)
SRV records for HTTP Stephane Bortzmeyer (Friday, 11 January)
- Re: SRV records for HTTP Frank Ellermann (Friday, 11 January)
  - Re: SRV records for HTTP Stephane Bortzmeyer (Friday, 11 January)
    - Re: SRV records for HTTP Adrian Chadd (Friday, 11 January)
http over sctp? Adrian Chadd (Wednesday, 9 January)
- Re: http over sctp? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 9 January)
- Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 10 January)
  - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 30 January)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 31 January)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Yves Lafon (Thursday, 31 January)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 31 January)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 31 January)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Yves Lafon (Thursday, 31 January)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status ?codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status?codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status ?codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Subbu Allamaraju (Monday, 25 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 26 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Subbu Allamaraju (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status ?codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status ?codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" Robert Siemer (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 15 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" Brian Smith (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - RE: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Brian Smith (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
    - Re: i69: Clarify "Requested Variant" [was: New "200 OK" status codes, PATCH & PROPFIND] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
Philidelphia Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re: conditional request vs GET (new issue?) Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 5 January)
Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Julian Reschke (Friday, 4 January)
- Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 8 January)
  - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 9 January)
    - RE: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Robert Brewer (Wednesday, 9 January)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Javier Godoy (Wednesday, 9 January)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Geoffrey Sneddon (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Robert Sayre (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Geoffrey Sneddon (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Robert Sayre (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 13 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Yutaka OIWA (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 14 February)
    - PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Frank Ellermann (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 19 February)
    - RE: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Brian Smith (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: PROCESS: Tracking design issues under discussion Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 27 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 14 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Frank Ellermann (Friday, 15 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 11 March)
    - Default charsets for text media types [i20] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20] Simon Perreault (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20] Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20] Martin Duerst (Wednesday, 26 March)
    - Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20] Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 26 March)
    - Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20] Martin Duerst (Thursday, 27 March)
    - OT: History (was: Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20]) Martin Duerst (Thursday, 27 March)
    - Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 25 March)
    - Re: Default charsets for text media types [i20] Martin Duerst (Wednesday, 26 March)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Geoffrey Sneddon (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Albert Lunde (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Unknown text/* subtypes [i20] Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 12 February)
- Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Geoffrey Sneddon (Thursday, 10 January)
  - text/* types and charset defaults Larry Masinter (Sunday, 13 January)
    - Re: text/* types and charset defaults Julian Reschke (Sunday, 20 January)
    - Re: text/* types and charset defaults Frank Ellermann (Sunday, 20 January)
    - Re: text/* types and charset defaults Albert Lunde (Sunday, 20 January)
    - Re: text/* types and charset defaults [i20] Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 22 January)
    - Re: text/* types and charset defaults [i20] Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 22 January)
    - security impact of dropping charset default [Re: text/* types and charset defaults [i20]] Yutaka Oiwa (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default [Re: text/* types and charset defaults [i20]] Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default [Re: text/* types and charset defaults [i20]] Yutaka Oiwa (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default David Morris (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 24 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 24 January)
    - "HTTP for Web Browsers and Servers" Larry Masinter (Thursday, 24 January)
    - Re: "HTTP for Web Browsers and Servers" Geoffrey Sneddon (Thursday, 24 January)
    - RE: "HTTP for Web Browsers and Servers" Larry Masinter (Friday, 25 January)
    - Re: "HTTP for Web Browsers and Servers" Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 30 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 30 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Yves Lafon (Thursday, 24 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Henrik Nordström (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 5 February)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default James Graham (Wednesday, 23 January)
    - Re: security impact of dropping charset default [Re: text/* types and charset defaults [i20]] Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 January)
- Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Ian Hickson (Sunday, 13 January)
  - Re: Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Eric Prud'hommeaux (Sunday, 13 January)
  - RE: Unknown text/* subtypes Larry Masinter (Thursday, 17 January)
- Re: Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Ned Freed (Monday, 14 January)
  - Re: Re: Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Eric Prud'hommeaux (Thursday, 17 January)
    - Re: Re: Re: Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Eric Prud'hommeaux (Friday, 18 January)
- Re: Unknown text/* subtypes Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: (Re: issue #93) Duplicated headers and security vulnerabilities Mark Nottingham (Friday, 4 January)
i22: ETags on PUT responses Mark Nottingham (Friday, 4 January)
- Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Julian Reschke (Friday, 4 January)
  - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Werner Baumann (Friday, 4 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Julian Reschke (Friday, 4 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Werner Baumann (Saturday, 5 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 5 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Werner Baumann (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Werner Baumann (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Werner Baumann (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Werner Baumann (Tuesday, 8 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Jamie Lokier (Monday, 7 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordström (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Jamie Lokier (Monday, 7 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordström (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordström (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 5 January)
Updated Patch James M Snell (Thursday, 3 January)
- Re: Updated Patch Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 January)
RE: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 2 January)
- RE: i93: Repeating Single-value headers David Morris (Thursday, 3 January)
  - RE: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 5 January)
    - Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Robert Siemer (Sunday, 6 January)
    - Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers Henrik Nordström (Sunday, 6 January)
- An alterntive approach regarding i93: Repeating Single-value headers David Morris (Thursday, 3 January)
  - Re: An alterntive approach regarding i93: Repeating Single-value ?headers Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 5 January)
RE: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 2 January)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Werner Baumann (Thursday, 3 January)
  - Re: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Larry Masinter (Sunday, 13 January)
    - Re: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Robert Siemer (Monday, 14 January)
  - Re: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 February)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Lisa Dusseault (Monday, 7 January)
  - Re: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Werner Baumann (Friday, 11 January)
  - Re: NEW ISSUE: weak validator: definition inconsistent Robert Siemer (Saturday, 12 January)

ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2008 by thread