- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:25:07 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 28/02/2008, at 11:26 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > It seems to me it would be unwise to say "clients SHOULD believe the > Allow header", but "servers MAY leave of methods". > > If we relax the requirement for the production, we also need to > relax the requirement for the recipient. How about Clients SHOULD believe the Allow header Servers SHOULD send a complete Allow header with weasel words on both sides to clarify that the client may try other ones in cases where it has external information / has explicit user input, and the servers may leave off methods for security, access control, or implementation reasons? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:25:24 UTC