- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:38:25 +0100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Mark Nottingham wrote: > If there are a few nodding heads here Nod, in essence. Some nits and questions: Maybe I missed it, but please mention that <URI-reference> is specified in STD 66. Some folks confuse URIs with IRIs, and then get it completely wrong. This confusion could be bad enough for a security consideration. You mention "Made", but you don't list it in the registry. IMO it should be "made", and you should mention that such relative URIs are supposed to be case-insensitive. Maybe the IANA Webmaster will be annoyed by this idea, and this needs work (?) Maybe add "updates 2626" (?) to get rid of it for 2616bis Maybe deprecate "rev" (?) as proposed by the HTML5 cabale The XLink stuff muddies the water, please remove it. We need to find out where "first", "last", and "payment" were defined. Has <http://www.w3.org/TR/relations.html> a status that can be referenced in a RFC ? Frank
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 09:36:40 UTC