Re: 307 Temporary Redirect from Julian Reschke on 2008-03-16 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2008)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:45:45 +0100
To: Nicolas Alvarez <nicolas.alvarez@gmail.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <47DD3299.1020400@gmx.de>

Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> 
> Should the description for 307 status code *explicitly* say that the 
> method must be the same? It says the client should use the new URI, and 
> without anything talking about methods, implicitly I can guess the 
> method shouldn't be changed. But it's not explicitly stated. There could 
> be problems with an implementor misreading it.
> 
> Maybe the same should be done with all redirection codes.

Not convinced.

Do you have any evidence of implementors who actually did get this wrong?

BR, Julian

Received on Sunday, 16 March 2008 14:46:35 UTC