- From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:33:53 +1300
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi I've recently come across a problem where a server a client is talking to is replying to a POST with HTTP/1.1 100 Continue Content-Length: 0 etc According to my reading of the RFC, a Content-Length field indicates the presence of a message body, and message bodies are specifically prohibited on 1xx messages. So is is therefore by extension prohibited to have a Content-Length (of any value) or Transfer-Encoding field on a 1xx message as well? Regards Adrien -- Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:33:04 UTC