- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:17:04 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > That would be nice, but the current version of Trac doesn't support > this; custom workflows will be available in .11, which I'm hoping will > be final and on the IETF tools site soon. > > Also, while doing it in Trac is convenient for me and the editors, it > doesn't really improve visibility for the rest of the WG. It's important > that discussion and decisions be made on the list, not in the tools. > > So, I'm going to try doing the following: > 1) linking the issues that are being considered for closure on our > wiki page <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/WikiStart>, and > 2) recording *mature* proposals in the issues list, and > 3) highlighting potential closures to design issues with a distinct > Subject line, and > 4) sending a weekly status e-mail to the list. > > Feedback as to whether any of these help, as well as additional > suggestions, welcome. All of this sounds good. In particular 4), it might help the WG concentrate on issues we want to close. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:17:32 UTC