- From: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:05:32 -0800
- To: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > Now <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/103>. > > I very nearly made this an editorial issue, but I thought > that it would be good to get general agreement that Content-* > is *not* constrained to just those headers defined by > RFC2616. Anyone have a problem with that? 1. Anybody can create a new must-understand header by naming it "Content-<something>." Is this desirable? 2. We cannot create must-understand headers without using that naming scheme. It seems odd. 3. Are headers prefixed with Content-* always entity headers? - Brian
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 02:05:40 UTC