- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:04:19 +0100
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yves Lafon wrote: > The definition of 201 assumes that only one resource is created, so if a > POST creates multiple new resources, 200 should be returned instead of > 201. However, in the text: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-01#section-9.2.2 > <<< > The response SHOULD include an entity containing a list of resource > characteristics and location(s) from which the user or user agent can > choose the one most appropriate. >>>> > Should we keep this "multiple locations for one resource" paradigm? First of all, I do not agree with the "single new resource" interpretation. As Brian observed, that would be a conflict with RFC5023. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 14:11:19 UTC