- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:48:22 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
OK, done with <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/232>. Note that this mainly affects P2, where I added the statement below to the Changes appendix: "Reclassify Allow header as response header, removing the option to specify it in a PUT request. (Section 10.1)" Also note that with this change, we got rid of another ABNF dependency from P3 to P2. BR, Julian Mark Nottingham wrote: > > I'm going to call this closed for now; if new information turns up, we > can reopen it. > > > On 03/03/2008, at 7:20 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> >> Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/105> >>> Proposal: >>> Change the classification of Allow to a response header, removing the >>> following text; >>> The Allow header field MAY be provided with a PUT request to >>> recommend the methods to be supported by the new or modified >>> resource. The server is not required to support these methods and >>> SHOULD include an Allow header in the response giving the actual >>> supported methods. >>> (or moving to an appendix and marking as deprecated behaviour) >> >> +1, unless examples of it being used turn up. >> >> If we remove it, I think mentioning it in the Changes section would be >> sufficient. >> >> BR, Julian >> >> > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 08:48:45 UTC