- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:42:35 -0800
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
On 14/02/2008, at 11:16 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I didn't even know the issue was considered as having a specific > resolution > until after the changeset was received. [We really should have a > separate > status for that in trac.] That would be nice, but the current version of Trac doesn't support this; custom workflows will be available in .11, which I'm hoping will be final and on the IETF tools site soon. Also, while doing it in Trac is convenient for me and the editors, it doesn't really improve visibility for the rest of the WG. It's important that discussion and decisions be made on the list, not in the tools. So, I'm going to try doing the following: 1) linking the issues that are being considered for closure on our wiki page <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/WikiStart>, and 2) recording *mature* proposals in the issues list, and 3) highlighting potential closures to design issues with a distinct Subject line, and 4) sending a weekly status e-mail to the list. Feedback as to whether any of these help, as well as additional suggestions, welcome. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:42:47 UTC