Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header

Robert Siemer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:36:37PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> I'm going to call this closed for now; if new information turns up, we  
>> can reopen it.
> 
> I haven't seen a response to my comment: why is it important or valid
> under the current charter to remove the possibility to use "Allow" in
> a request?

Doesn't that fall under

"* Remove or deprecate those features that are not widely implemented
and also unduly affect interoperability"

?

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 11:38:07 UTC