- From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:06:43 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Mark Nottingham wrote: [snip] > Are there any other headers (besides URI-based headers) that we need to > consider, beyond these? > * WWW-Authenticate, Proxy-Authenticate, Authorization, Proxy-Authorization > * Content-Disposition > * From > * Warning > * PICS-Label > PICS is, of course, still a W3C Rec - however, it is worth noting that, unless something goes horribly wrong, it will be withdrawn in favour of POWDER within the next 12 months. My organisation (formerly ICRA, née RSAC) has been associated with PICS since it began and we operate the PICS labelling system found in Internet Explorer (yes, still in IE7) - in other words, if anyone has an interest in PICS, FOSI does - and even I'd hate to see anyone spend valuable time updating PICS-Label HTTP headers now. Cheers Phil. -- Phil Archer Chief Technical Officer, Family Online Safety Institute w. http://www.fosi.org/people/philarcher/
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 11:07:22 UTC